Do you have the three bad habits of safety management professionals?

Thread Content

In daily operations, it is common to find poor practices among workers; for example, they fail to fasten the chin strap of their safety helmets at construction sites, or they refrain from using safety belts when working at heights of over 2 meters due to convenience. However, safety management personnel also have some bad habits. Take a look; do you have any of these bad habits? Accustomed to the practice of borrowing ideas: “Ah, I have to draft another apology plan again; it’s really frustrating!” “It’s simple enough – just change the timeline from last year’s plan, and that’s it.” Two sentences, one phenomenon. Some safety inspectors may be familiar with similar scenarios. The problems exposed in this regard are even more obvious. As is well known, safety inspectors have a lot of paperwork to handle. To save time, some of them either copy regulations and inspection plans from the Internet or make random changes to previous measures, resulting in identical inspections every year. As a result, critical safety hazards that need to be addressed urgently fail to be properly dealt with. Work safety management cannot be carried out mechanically by following rules to the letter, nor can it be handled in a perfunctory manner. Once safety managers adopt a perfunctory attitude, creating an environment of poor standards at the top, how can they dare or be able to ensure the safety of frontline workers? It has turned out that in all cases of work safety accidents, the rules and regulations of the responsible entities either had certain flaws or failed to meet the requirements, with risk prevention measures not being compatible with the actual working conditions on site. The causes of accidents are nothing but factors such as people, machinery, the environment, and management. We generally consider the main causes of accidents to be unsafe human behavior or unsafe conditions of objects, yet we often overlook management deficiencies. Safety regulations and rules are the foundation upon which workers can carry out their work safely. As part of management, safety supervisors must adopt the right mindset and carefully develop regulations that suit the characteristics of the working environment, avoiding a mere adoption of pre-existing rules. Safety inspections are a formality; whether it’s routine inspections, specialized inspections, seasonal inspections, or those carried out before and after holidays, it seems that such superficial and perfunctory approaches are all too common. Some safety management personnel in enterprises mistakenly believe that safety inspections merely require finding a few potential hazards as a formality; after all, identifying too many hazards can offend people, and there is also a fear that it might hinder the completion of production tasks and upset the managers. They long ago threw aside the principle of “three noes to production”. If safety management personnel are hesitant and lack principles when identifying potential hazards, then the principle of \"safety first\" can only remain an empty slogan with no real meaning. I ask, how can nothing go wrong with such inspections? I have always believed that only a safety officer who is not afraid of offending others is a competent one. Checking – if there are no hidden dangers, that is actually the biggest danger. The onboarding training is essentially ineffective. The three levels of safety training refer to factory-level safety training, workshop-level safety training, and job-specific (section/team) safety training. Through three-level training, new employees can quickly acquire job safety skills and identify hazard factors in the production area. However, in some organizations, safety managers fail to carry out the three-level safety training as required; they simply have new employees read the safety regulations without providing any explanations, or they give them the answers to the questions so that they can copy them down, in order to meet the inspection requirements of higher-level authorities. It fails completely to achieve the desired effects of on-site training. Level 3 safety training is the first formal safety education that new employees receive upon joining the company, and it holds special significance for their awareness of self-protection in their future work. Therefore, as safety management personnel, one should possess a high sense of responsibility, carry out thorough three-level safety education, foster correct safety attitudes among employees, and ensure their safety while working. Safety production managers bear heavy responsibilities within enterprises and serve as the backbone in ensuring safe production there. Whether a safety officer is competent directly affects the safe production of a department or even an entire company. As part of this group, we must be even stricter with ourselves, abandon bad practices, and uphold the red line of safe production for our employees.