I have a question: why is the pro2 much smaller than the Aspen?

2016-08-15View Original

Thread Content

I have a question: why is the pro2 much smaller than the Aspen? Experts are welcome to share their opinions; Pro2 has only a few hundred megabytes of storage, while Aspen has several gigabytes, and both programs load and run quickly with Pro2. So the question is, what is the reason? Does the literal meaning mean that Aspen has richer and more accurate content? There’s no other meaning to it; I find the Pro2 to be quite premium as well. I don’t quite understand it; let’s discuss it together. :P

Reply #22016-08-24

The content is much worse, okay? Aspen has more than one plus

Reply #32016-08-24

Well, when it comes to opening and running, Plus is clearly much slower

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.

I have a question: why is the pro2 much smaller than the Aspen?

Thread Content

Related Threads in This Forum

← Previous

Next →

Submit a Project

Disclaimer

Quick Links