Thread Content
This post was last edited by zxg.wylton on 2016-8-18 at 15:44. This month I purchased an online conductivity meter from a company in Shanghai; it is showing some abnormal behavior when used in the field. Later, during \"research\" in the laboratory, conductivity and temperature were both simulated using resistance, and it was found that: for example, with an electrode constant of 0.1 and a fixed temperature of 25 degrees, using a 10 kOhm resistor yielded a value of 10 us/cm, which is correct. However, after short-circuiting the 10 kΩ resistor at the electrode terminal and then disconnecting it, the displayed value does not return to 10 us/cm; instead, it fluctuates between 30 and 50. It was further found that the parallel short-circuit resistor fails to return to the normal detection state when the resistance is below a certain value. I really haven’t encountered this issue with the conductivity of the 7 different model brands before. Another issue is that when a 0.1 probe is used, the measured deionized water level is 10 to 20 times higher than the normal value. I called the manufacturer, and they said I couldn’t use resistance simulation, using a lot of technical jargon; they also claimed that only their own electrodes could be used, saying I didn’t understand conductivity meters. I had hoped for some creative ideas, but I’m still confused: after all, I’ve been using over twenty different brands of conductivity meters for more than a decade now. It seems I need to be more careful when making purchases next time; another clause needs to be added to the technical terms. And study hard*. Or maybe I really am at fault.
I’ll take the blame myself to prevent everyone from suffering the same treatment at the hands of that manufacturer. It’s possible that the manufacturer was aware of the design issues earlier on; maybe they’re just stocking up goods at low prices. Those who are interested are welcome to provide the technical agreement: