HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

2016 Chemical Engineering Professional Examination

2016-09-04View Original

Thread Content

First, mourn for yourself! The admission ticket number was filled in incorrectly; the numbers at the start of each of the four sessions are 1234. . . However, the second coating was applied incorrectly, so the result is clear. I also want to remind my friends to be careful during exams in the future! Secondly, the output from this task follows the style of 2014 – with various unconventional approaches and somewhat unconventional use of professional knowledge. Personally, I think what was presented this afternoon was relatively normal, but the amount of computation required was quite high. As for professional knowledge, I think there’s generally no problem as long as you’ve read the relevant books; no matter how difficult it is, it’s still possible to score 2X60. . . It’s a shame about my first afternoon. . . I’m pretty confident about almost all the multiple-choice questions. . . From the very beginning of the case exam in the morning, I could sense the examiner’s deep malice; I wondered countless times what to do, and still felt sorrowful over having filled in the wrong information on my admission ticket. . . I just couldn’t finish the first question. . . The later parts were quite average in quality; the difficulty level of the questions was high as well. I tried various approaches, and it seems that around 17 questions had answers that matched the correct options, while for the rest I could only guess at the answers. . . The afternoon felt more peaceful, and my state of mind improved as well. Anyway, the outcome is already determined; I just need to do my best. It’s the first question again; deep malice strikes once more. . . Having seen the specific heat of sodium chloride, I think I’ll first calculate using sodium chloride; if that doesn’t work, I’ll move on. The result is just skipping it. . . The rest went fairly well; aside from that annoying parallel connection of pumps and the issue related to the insulation thickness, all other questions were answered. The question on sodium chloride was also solved. In short, the afternoon was normal, and it seems I should be able to answer question 15. As soon as the exams were over on the first day and I saw that there was almost no absorption distillation, I knew things wouldn’t be easy this year. . . It seems the word “extraction” wasn’t mentioned this year. . . Let’s wait and see next year; I prepared seriously for almost a month, and that’s how it ends. . . Alas, what a pity!
Reply #22016-09-04
Help, please share some review tips. I’m a beginner who didn’t pass the exam on the first try; I plan to take it again next year. Thank you
Reply #32016-09-04
Please give a rating! I really don’t have much experience. If I’ve forgotten almost everything, I’ll go through the books provided by the association and work through the exercise sets; with that, I can handle the regular questions. Then I’ll find past exam papers on Haichuan, print them out, and go through them to understand how the exams are structured – and that’s it! Since there is a large variation in everyone’s baseline skills, there are no fixed guidelines. The CPA exam is still essentially just an exam, and its relevance to actual engineering design isn’t very high. The standards for testing professional knowledge are quite limited – it’s just those few areas that are used on a regular basis. If you think your foundation is strong enough and one month is sufficient, then for my serious review this year it took me about one month. I won’t talk about the first day – you’ll definitely pass. If there are issues with the knowledge cards, you should still be able to score 60 on the practice questions. If you feel your foundation isn’t strong enough, then three months will do: read the books twice and work through the real exam questions three times, and you’ll be fine as well. As for books, I personally think the association’s materials should be the main focus, with the Xia Qing version of Chemical Engineering Principles and the Tianjin University textbooks as supplementary sources.
Reply #42016-09-04
That pump is connected in parallel – why didn’t I see it? Which question is that?
Reply #52016-09-04
At the pump outlet, with the pipes connected in parallel, there is a pipe with a flow rate of 100 m3 and a diameter of 100 mm; there’s also an unused pipe with a diameter of 80 mm that needs to be added. . .
Reply #62016-09-04
I didn’t use a pump at all when working on this problem; it’s fine as long as the resistance loss is the same
Reply #72016-09-04
Don’t joke with me – my score is around 60 points; I can’t stand making even one mistake
Reply #82016-09-04
Oh, you use the fifth root of five in relation to the length, right? . . Isn’t this water pumped out? The flow rate of a natural pump driven by a pump will change, right?
Reply #92016-09-04
That’s a great question! Keep browsing Haichuan for a few months and you’ll know! Oh, right, remember that – you need to take the required Shanghai Chuan exam for your major; otherwise you won’t pass. . @Moderator

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.