HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Suggestions for high-altitude work management

2016-09-07View Original

Thread Content

The two main risks associated with working at heights are falls of personnel and impacts from falling objects. Of course, we can also identify other risks, such as damage to equipment and other such issues. But when it comes to work at heights, no matter how much is said, the key is still the preventive control of these two major risks. What I want to talk about here is the methods for preventing and controlling personnel falls. First, the seat belt is not safe. More and more companies are avoiding the use of belt-type safety belts; in fact, those are not fall-protection belts, but rather restraining straps used to free up the hands while working at heights or on edges, so as to maintain balance. Large, responsible companies are strongly promoting five-point safety belts with padded tear pockets and dual hooks. No matter how good a safety belt is, it serves only to prevent employees from falling to the ground; however, the impacts and shocks during the fall, as well as the damage caused by the safety belt itself while holding the body in place, can also be fatal. Second, a safety belt must be worn when working at a height of 2 meters or more; this is a general requirement specified in GB. But is it not necessary to use a seat belt at heights below two meters? At a height of two meters, at what height should the belt attachment point be positioned in order to prevent falling? Most of the five-point dual-hook fall-arrest safety belts produced in our country are manufactured in accordance with European standards. A distance of at least 6 meters from the suspension point to the falling surface is required to fully achieve the effect of preventing falls; otherwise, the person will still fall onto the falling surface and suffer injuries.
Reply #22016-09-07
Article 2 is still unclear; don’t rely dogmatically on seat belts, but focus more on solving the issues related to work platforms and fences
Reply #32016-09-08
“All three \"safeties\" are necessary. Here is an example: on a 20-centimeter tray, a person was working on it; although they were wearing a safety helmet, the strap wasn’t fastened. While coming down from the pallet, the person tripped and hit their head on the ground. The safety helmet fell during this process, losing its protective function, which led to a fatal accident.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.