HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Comparison of MTBE and ETBE

2016-11-24View Original

Thread Content

Comparison of MTBE and ETBE: Octane number improvers (additives) for gasoline are an aspect of high-octane gasoline technology. There are three types of legally approved gasoline additives in the United States, namely: a) MTBE (methyl tert-butyl ether), b) ethanol (EtOH), and c) ETBE (ethyl tert-butyl ether). ETBE, ethanol, and MTBE are all gasoline modifiers or additives of this kind. Mixing them into gasoline in a certain proportion can not only improve the performance of gasoline but also be environmentally friendly. (Pb-free, pollution-free). (1) MTBE (Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether): Methyl tert-butyl ether – The maximum amount that can be added is 15 Vol%. MTBE is an aliphatic ether with the molecular formula C5H12O, a molecular weight of 88.14, a specific gravity of 0.741 at 20°C, and a viscosity of 0.27 at 20°C; it has an ether-like odor. Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) is the earliest developed and used ether-based octane booster. Since the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approved MTBE for use as an additive in lead-free gasoline in 1979, it has been widely used in gasoline blending in the United States. MTBE has a relatively low boiling point; adding it to gasoline lowers the boiling range of the gasoline. This effect brings significant economic benefits to refineries that produce ultra-high octane gasoline. MTBE (methyl tert-butyl ether) is currently widely used; due to the difficulties involved in its production, many countries, including my own, rely on imports for it. In recent years, scientific research has uncovered the disadvantages of MTBE: it is not easily decomposed and can cause pollution to groundwater ; It has a slight odor that can make drivers uncomfortable, and may cause symptoms such as nausea, eye pain, and blisters. The United States has recently passed a \"Clean Fuel Act\" that will ban MTBE over the next 4 years. The majority of ethanol growth in Europe is expected to come in the form of ethyl tert-butyl ether (ETBE). (2) ETBE (Ethyl Tertiary Butyl Ether): Ethyl tert-butyl ether – the maximum amount that can be added is 17 Vol%; it is produced by mixing 47% ethanol with 53% isobutylene. Similar to MTBE, adding ethyl tert-butyl ether to gasoline is equivalent to adding ethanol to it. ETBE is not only more effective than MTBE in raising gasoline octane number, but it can also be used as a co-solvent. ETBE has a high boiling point and does not form azeotropes when mixed with hydrocarbons. This not only reduces air resistance inside the engine but also lowers evaporation losses. ETBE can be broken down by aerobic microorganisms, but MTBE cannot. ETBE not only increases the octane rating of gasoline, but also improves its economic efficiency and safety compared to gasoline with MTBE added, thus it holds great market potential. Comparison conclusion: A. Compared to MTBE, ETBE not only improves the octane rating of gasoline but can also be used as a co-solvent. Moreover, it improves both the economy and safety of gasoline compared to gasoline with MTBE added. B. ETBE has a high boiling point and does not form azeotropes when mixed with hydrocarbons. This not only reduces air resistance inside the engine but also lowers evaporation losses. C. The distillation range of ETBE and isooctane is narrow, which can improve the drivability index ; DI) and the control of VOCs (volatile organic compounds) during mixing. D. ETBE has a higher octane rating, a lower Raoult vapor pressure, and less water solubility than MTBE; therefore, it is more suitable as an oxygenate additive for gasoline than ethanol, and thus ETBE holds great market potential. 3. Current status of ETBE synthesis technology (see “Appendix 2” for details). Catalytic distillation is the development direction of ETBE production technology; in addition, ethanol recovery technology is an important component of ETBE production technology. Currently, the technology of recovering ethanol using pervaporation membrane separation has low energy consumption and holds good prospects. Currently, the production technology for ETBE abroad is highly mature. The main companies around the world that possess this technology include the French Institute of Petroleum (IFP), CDTECH in the United States, ARCO Chemicals, UOP, and Phillips Petroleum. There are not many institutions in China that research ETBE production technology, and most of them are still at the pilot stage. As MTBE is gradually phased out, research on ETBE has received increasing attention. At present, foreign ether synthesis technologies are highly advanced, with MTBE, TAME, and ETBE all being produced on an industrial scale. In China, only MTBE is produced on an industrial scale domestically; the TAME synthesis technology is in the stage of industrial implementation, while the ETBE synthesis technology is still in the research phase. ETBE is generally produced by reacting isobutylene in mixed C4 with ethanol in the presence of an acidic catalyst; this is an exothermic reaction, and in industrial production large-pore sulfuric acid-type ion exchange resins are predominantly used as catalysts. The side reactions are mainly the dimerization and hydration of ethylenebutene. In terms of reactor design, ETBE production technologies can be divided into fixed-bed technology and catalytic distillation technology. The fixed-bed technology is simple in equipment and easy to operate, but the isobutylene conversion rate is limited by thermodynamic equilibrium, reaching a maximum of only 92% (under high temperature and pressure), and the reaction heat cannot be utilized. Catalytic distillation technology disrupts the thermodynamic equilibrium of the reaction, enabling an isobutylene conversion rate of over 99.5%. The C4 compound resulting from etherification contains almost no isobutylene, and can be used to produce basic chemical raw materials such as 1-butene and butadiene. Moreover, the heat generated by the reaction is utilized for product separation, thereby reducing energy consumption. Therefore, the catalytic distillation technique for synthesizing ETBE is more competitive in industrial production, and the key to this technology lies in the method of loading the catalyst in the catalytic distillation column. Catalytic distillation technology represents the development direction of ETBE production techniques. Additionally, ethanol recovery technology is an important component of ETBE production processes. Currently, the technology of using pervaporation membranes for ethanol separation and recovery has low energy consumption, offering promising prospects. Currently, the production technology for ETBE abroad is highly mature. The main companies around the world that possess this technology include the French Institute of Petroleum (IFP), CDTECH in the United States, ARCO Chemicals, UOP, and Phillips Petroleum. There are not many institutions in China that research ETBE production technology, and most of them are still at the pilot stage.
Reply #22016-11-27
Is the standard for Jing 6 oil related to this blending agent?

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.