HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Natural compensator settings

2017-05-12View Original

Thread Content

Hello everyone, which one is better, Figure 1 or Figure 2? And why? Thank you.
Reply #22017-05-12
2. There are no changes in the construction; why not choose one with a stronger structure?
Reply #32017-05-12
1. π is meant to be absorbable, right? There must be fixed supports on both sides; to allow π to move more freely, isn’t 1 a better choice?
Reply #42017-05-12
1. It’s better; the compensator is subjected only to axial forces
Reply #52017-05-13
The compensation is the same; it’s better from a force analysis perspective.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.