HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Position of the thrust bracket for the natural compensator

2017-05-24View Original

Thread Content

Hello everyone, as shown in the diagram, which is better, position 1 or position 2? What factors do they consider respectively? Thank you.
Reply #22017-05-24
Can I say that all the drawings I’ve seen show locations further away than 2, and even further away than 1?
Reply #32017-05-24
But I did see position 1.
Reply #42017-05-24
Placed in position 1, what role does it play in buffering thermal expansion?
Reply #52017-05-24
I work in a design institute; normally we would place it at position 2, and distance still requires stress calculation. It is possible to place it in position 1 as well; there is no issue with safety in that case. However, placing it in position 1 wastes the compensating capacity of this variant square compensator. Unless there are other special reasons, such an arrangement is safe but not the optimal one.
Reply #62017-05-25
There’s already a perfect answer downstairs :)

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.