HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

『Original by HaiChuan Translation Team』Effective flow area of the pressure relief valve

2018-06-13View Original

Thread Content

English title: Actual Orifice Areas For Different Relief Valve Manufacturers Based On Api 526 Orifice Designations
Original link: Click here
Original author: ankur2061
Translator ID: @rain814218551
Those who wish to subscribe to the articles from the “Haichuan Translation Group” are invited to leave a message below the post saying “I want to subscribe”, or send me a message; I will notify everyone as soon as new articles are available. Effective orifice areas of relief valves from various manufacturers based on API 526 orifice designations: API 526 provides standards for orifice designations corresponding to the cross-sectional areas of relief valve orifices, such as D, E, F. . Wait. However, most pressure relief valve manufacturers provide a channel code that has the same designation as API 526 but a different channel area (higher than API 526), by using a reduced outflow coefficient for the channel. They call it the “effective flow area” or “effective discharge area”; when used with their own discharge coefficient, it is equal to the flow area specified in the API 526 standard. In fact, if you are calculating the flow rate for a pressure relief valve, especially for the design of the inlet and outlet pipes with the goal of reducing the inlet pressure energy by 3% and the outlet pipe pressure energy by 10% (for conventional pressure relief valves), then you can use the \"effective flow area\" specified in the formulas in Part 1 of API520 to calculate the flow rate through the flow channels provided by the specific manufacturer. Today’s article provides well-known pressure relief valve manufacturers around the world with an Excel sheet showing that their \"effective flow area\" is higher than the area corresponding to the flow area code specified in the API 526 standard. If someone chooses a specific model from a particular manufacturer, such as “Farris Company” or “Leser Company”, this table should be useful. Not all manufacturers or models are included, but some well-known manufacturers and their standard models are covered; they can use this table to determine the actual flow rate calculated from the formulas in Part 1 of API 520. It should be noted that this Excel workbook does not include the flow area specified in the ASME Section VIII standard; it only covers the API 526 standard.
Reply #22018-06-13
@@Shuangmu_DTQO @Jacob (Latitude and Longitude) 82 @henjuese @yx5494 @HP0377 @Zi, he remains silent @kid_ptd @zhdw0906 @cslgwbb @yangshaoj2005 @Ameba @w1d3d55 @13996816971 @Beautiful Dreams @mech_zhou @My Chemical Romance @liuquan1100 @Great Mercedes @zhangfei272 @Falcon2014 @Hansonwen @jslx2012 @liangmaoqian @yeyeyess @13666899405 @By the Water zwb @gengen1115 @xupei19880919 @Haichuan user @Drunk for Her Alone @myworld1978 @Crazy Snail @601087456 @dhgsjw @panshutao @1qaz2wsx3edc4 @qwl @rsq98 @yusmile @gllwxl @nijunri @rooselvt001 *@ao00 @lhdlch @yts98 @zhaojiafeng @718583438 @cherry_NJIR @13110450376 @Lu Yanxiang @518_AIEV @Pingshui Yimu @SDHZZXM @Jubao Pen Yi @bxgsx @gwjjq @tangml @Who Else But Me? @ggw2010 @Li Yanpeng Shaanxi Coal Group @lxj741120 @jackwen @hity630703 @jslx2012 @wolf19890625 @bxgsx @jiutianyunhe @wdq3312 @kyr @shengguanfacai @Hehe Haha @The Wise One @hr3221 @My Heart Like Bamboo Breeze @shenconan @wx_Piggy616616 @542925680 @Little Sheep Joseph @dzsunshubin @rsq98 .XD. @guorui0971 @juniger @gwygwy @alwaysyz @wqltj12 @Flying Idiot
Reply #32018-06-13
I’ve used those from Fukui and GE. . .
Reply #42018-06-20
There is a type of safety valve that is based on the cross-sectional area
Reply #52018-06-21
Huh? Can’t see it? I can see it quite clearly. Are you viewing it on your phone?
Reply #62018-06-25
It tends to be blurry when viewed on a mobile phone; check if the image can be enlarged. If it’s not clear even when enlarged, I’ll send it to you separately
Reply #72018-11-23
It turns out that the flow channel area of leser is 526 higher. But in reality, the supplier of the safety valve should indicate its actual flow area as well as the calculated actual discharge volume when returning the relevant data. If anyone has relevant information, they can compare it with this table

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.