HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Doubts about the design of vacuum tubes

2019-07-06View Original

Thread Content

Recently, I encountered some issues related to the design and use of vacuum pipes, and I would like to ask the experts for any good suggestions: Option A: Place the main vacuum pipe in the air. Advantage: There are no pipes on the ground to cause obstacles; The pipeline design is relatively simple. Disadvantage: The equipment is connected to the DN50 branch pipe using a bellows (semi-transparent), and water accumulates inside the bellows. The bellows hanging in the air doesn’t give a very good visual effect. Option B: Place the vacuum main pipeline on the ground. Advantage: No water accumulation inside the bellows. Disadvantage: Pipes on the ground cause obstruction ; At the same time, the main pipes experience significant elevation changes, resulting in poor vacuum performance and water accumulation in the ground pipes. My question is: regardless of whether it’s Option A or Option B, in terms of vacuum extraction performance and overall cable management, which option is better?
Reply #22019-07-06
Everyone tends to choose A; especially when they see something blocking the way and preventing them from passing, it makes them uncomfortable
Reply #32019-07-07
Personally, I lean towards B. A small liquid separation tank is installed at the end of the pipeline, which helps to address the issue of water accumulation in the main pipe. Since the medium is gas, even though the main pipe has a high lift, it does not have a significant impact on the vacuum pumping efficiency.
Reply #42019-07-08
Tending towards A; no particular reason. The actual effect can only be tested
Reply #52019-07-08
I think Option A provides a better vacuum effect than Option B
Reply #62019-07-09
Okay, thank you all for your enthusiasm. For now, let’s go with A temporarily. . .
Reply #72019-07-11
Personally, I think Option A is better than Option B; in Option B, the pipe goes up and then down, increasing its length and potentially affecting the vacuum level.
Reply #82019-07-13
Option A is better; the hose does not need to be too long, and the branch pipes can be connected to easily accessible positions on the ground, allowing for a neat arrangement. Additionally, if the upward-extending pipes do not interfere with safety passages, they should be lowered as much as possible.
Reply #92019-07-13
For Option A, a gas-liquid separation tank can be added, and the pipes can be given an appropriate slope
Reply #102019-07-13
For Option A, a gas-liquid separation tank can be added, and the pipes can be given an appropriate slope
Reply #112019-07-13
A, you’ve already said that B doesn’t work well!

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.