Thread Content
The condition of a steam trap can be determined by observing it; whether a steam trap is functioning properly can generally be assessed by non-professionals using some simple methods. Among them, the visual inspection method is a relatively convenient and simple approach. Visual inspection in the flowing state – visual inspection of the drain outlet. Although the distance that can be viewed visually is limited, it remains an important first step in determining whether a steam trap is functioning properly. For example, a common observation is that a decrease in the amount of condensate discharged, or excessive steam leakage at the outlet of the trap, indicates that the trap needs to be repaired. Of course, visual assessment is only applicable to open systems. As the trap opens and closes, there are corresponding changes in the secondary steam. If there is no change in the steam flow, but a certain whistling sound is present, this generally indicates that the trap is leaking. Due to the presence of water in the secondary steam, it usually appears milky white in color. If there is a relatively long (more than 10 cm) transparent section of steam right next to the drain on the trap side, this indicates a high likelihood that the trap is leaking live steam. Years of experience at Hangzhou Watt have shown that when a closed-loop condensate recovery system is used, pipes hinder visual inspection. In some cases, installing a sight glass at the outlet of the steam trap can help with visual inspection. Effect of secondary steam: The visual inspection method requires an understanding of the effect of secondary steam. Secondary steam, also known as flash steam, is generated when high-pressure saturated condensate is released into a low-pressure environment. Due to the lower \"sensible heat\" of low-pressure saturated condensate, the condensate with higher \"sensible heat\" discharged by the steam trap will evaporate again in that low-pressure environment in order to absorb the excess \"sensible heat\". We call this portion of the vapor that is vaporized again secondary steam. The proportion of secondary steam is related to the pressure difference before and after the condensate; the greater the pressure difference, the higher the proportion of secondary steam. The calculation of secondary steam can be done using the following formula: %Secondary Steam = (SH – SL) / H * 100%. Here, SH represents the specific heat of the high-pressure condensate before it is released, SL represents the specific heat of the high-pressure condensate after it is released, and H represents the latent heat of vaporization of the low-pressure secondary steam. For example, when condensate at 7 bar is released to atmospheric pressure, the proportion of secondary steam is 13.4%. In other words, when 1000 kg of 7-bar condensed water is released to atmospheric pressure, it will actually consist of 134 kg of secondary steam and 866 kg of condensed water. The problem is that the volume estimated visually can vary significantly: at atmospheric pressure, the volume of 134 kg of steam is 134*1.673 m3/kg = 224 m3; 1.673 m3/kg is the specific volume of steam at atmospheric pressure. At atmospheric pressure, the volume of 866 kg of condensed water is 0.866 m3. It is easy to imagine that when condensed water is released from a pressure of 7 bar to atmospheric pressure, almost all of it appears as secondary steam. Inspecting the operation of a steam trap through a sight glass allows us to determine whether it is functioning properly, but this is possible only if: 1) the pipes before the steam trap are properly selected, and 2) the sight glass is installed in front of the steam trap, not behind it. In our practical work, at Hangzhou Watt, we often find in the field that sight glasses are installed behind steam traps; when a sight glass is placed behind such a valve, it is not possible to accurately display the status of the valve. Visual inspection of flow condition – Bypass check method: The drain valve is operating properly, with a small amount of water accumulated in front of the valve ； If the valve is inspected before it is opened, or if the bypass of the steam trap is activated, what flows out through the bypass valve – usually, if there is no water accumulation – may indicate a leak in the steam trap ； And if there is too much water accumulation, the drain valve may fail to drain water or have insufficient drainage capacity. If the valve is inspected before it is opened, or if the bypass of the steam trap is activated, the steam trap should stop functioning immediately ； If steam is still escaping from the steam trap after the bypass is opened, it is almost certain that the steam trap is leaking. Visual inspection in operating condition – no-load test: For heat exchangers, it is sometimes impossible to determine whether a steam trap is leaking; in such cases, the steam trap is operated under no-load conditions. Under no-load conditions, thermostatic traps and float traps are almost completely closed, while inverted bucket traps may exhibit dripping. If a large amount of steam still escapes behind the steam trap when there is no load, then the steam trap is leaking.