Thread Content
This post was last edited by in the blink of an eye on 2019-12-13 08:11. After working in this industry for so many years, I’ve seen that a large portion of the maintenance work carried out in most sulfuric acid plants is aimed at addressing the problem of acid accumulation in the dry absorption towers – though it’s only a temporary \"solution\". The dry mesh belt causes acid corrosion in the downstream hot and cold exchangers, while the suction demister causes acid corrosion in the downstream intermediate hot and cold exchangers. In systems with heat and cold exchange as well as intermediate heat and cold exchange, once the tube bundles are corroded and punctured, causing internal leakage, the conversion rate will inevitably be compromised. When the tubes leaking at the hot and cold exchangers as well as the intermediate hot and cold exchangers are sealed due to parking, it is found that the heat exchange area decreases, and the self-heat balance is affected as a result. This creates a cycle: acid in the dry absorber mist eliminator → internal leakage in the downstream and intermediate heat exchangers → decreased conversion rate → inspection and repair of leaks in the heat exchangers plus catalyst replacement → increased conversion rate → acid in the dry absorber mist eliminator → internal leakage in the downstream and intermediate heat exchangers → decreased conversion rate → inspection and repair of leaks in the heat exchangers plus catalyst replacement → reduced heat exchange area in the heat exchangers → disruption of the thermal balance in the conversion process → inability to maintain the temperature in the subsequent beds → decreased conversion rate → replacement of the dry absorber mist eliminator → acid in the dry absorber mist eliminator → internal leakage in the downstream and intermediate heat exchangers → (cycle continues)
It is evident that many sulfuric acid plants in China find it difficult to break free from the aforementioned cycle.
It’s evident that in many sulfuric acid plants, the problem of mist removers in dry absorbers being corroded by acid persists for a long time; naturally, this prevents them from breaking free from the aforementioned cycle……
Simple things have become complicated; the drying tower and the first absorption tower use non-metallic wire meshes to prevent corrosion, while the second absorption tower employs fiber mist eliminators; Or adopt a one-turn-one-suction process to reduce the heat exchanger
The sulfuric acid plant we designed doesn’t require any maintenance even after half a year
This post was last edited by in the blink of an eye on 2019-12-14 11:30: Use a screen for drawing? Won’t you remove that large amount of sub-micron acid mist in that absorption tower? If it doesn’t need maintenance for half a year, that can’t be called long-cycle operation; P
Could the original poster share any solutions?
This post was last edited by boqing_zh on 2019-12-19 at 16:39. Are you saying that your Brink defogger (? ) No, it’s not possible to let one absorption tower handle such high levels of acidity: lol