HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

The turbine extracts steam at 1.0 Mpa, which is the same as the steam pressure at the turbine’s back pressure, also 1.0 Mpa

2018-01-27View Original

Thread Content

Dear sea friends, as the title suggests, what are the advantages and disadvantages of the two steam generation approaches in terms of turbine selection? Suddenly, this question came to mind: personally, I think there isn’t much difference, right? I majored in instrumentation and work frequently with compressor control, so I would like to ask for your feedback if there are any mistakes in what I say; discussions from everyone are welcome.
Reply #22018-01-27
For the two steam-output options at 1.0 MPa alone, the difference is indeed minimal; however, the choice between a extraction-condensing turbine or a back-pressure turbine depends on the requirements of the installation: turbine speed, steam pressure, flow rate, available installation space, the purpose of the condensate, and so on.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.