Talk about those common, meaningless clauses in technical agreements
Thread Content
Let’s talk about those common, meaningless clauses in technical agreements. For example, “The supplier guarantees that the prices of the product’s vulnerable components will remain unchanged for two years” and “The supplier guarantees that the equipment will have a normal service life of 20 years.” Both of these are clauses that make no sense at all, right? The performance period of a business contract (including the warranty period) is often just over a year; once this period expires, the contract becomes invalid and the warranty deposit has been paid. What does the buyer have to hold the supplier accountable with? If the supplier violates these two clauses, the buyer has no way to deal with it
These restrictions are in place to prevent the substitution of inferior products with higher-quality ones, as well as to prevent monopolies. Actually, it was all done by the property owners themselves. If you don’t choose good equipment, you’ll just go for the cheap option. Or they place too much emphasis on business aspects and neglect technology.
Strictly speaking, the technical specifications can serve as attachments to the contract and have legal validity; therefore, even after the warranty period has expired, if there are violations of the terms of the technical agreement, the buyer can seek legal recourse if the seller fails to fulfill its obligations
Keeping the price unchanged helps control the costs of spare parts and prevents excessive expenses in the future – 20 years? I’m not sure about other equipment, but API610 requires that the design life of pumps be no less than 20 years; however, it does not require a service life of 20 years
What’s the point of writing a 20-year term when the warranty period is only one year? Once the warranty period expires and the payment for the contract has been made, what can be used to hold the supplier accountable?
Those common, meaningless clauses in technical agreements serve to provide clarity within the parties involved and to shift some of the responsibilities; therefore, what needs to be written should still be written.