HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Welding process

2017-02-25View Original

Thread Content

Could the experts please help me answer this: Can the welding process for S32168+Q345R/S32168 be replaced by the two welding process evaluations for S32168/Q345 and S32168/S32168?
Reply #22017-02-26
It depends on whether the laminated structure is considered part of the strength factor; if it isn’t, a Q345R butt joint combined with a stainless steel butt joint can be used as an alternative. (I did it this way, and the Special Inspection Agency raised no issues either)
Reply #32017-02-27
I didn’t understand what you meant by your question !
Reply #42024-03-25
There are reasons to suspect that a S32168 fitting was inserted after drilling holes in a Q345R/S32168 composite plate; it’s related to those two weld evaluations – I spent the whole afternoon guessing!

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.