Should a reaction vessel be classified as a static equipment or a dynamic equipment?
Thread Content
Should a reaction vessel be classified as a static equipment or a dynamic equipment? Because there is stirring, but the reactor vessel is considered a type of container
In other words, a ‘pot’ can be understood as a type of container; colloquially, it can be called a kettle. It can be used for steaming, boiling, and stir-frying. When steaming or boiling, there is no need to stir, while stir-frying requires stirring. The same is true for reaction vessels; as long as there is a chemical or physical reaction, it can be called a reaction vessel, and stirring is not necessarily required.
The reaction vessel is a static equipment, while the agitator on it is a dynamic equipment.
They are right. The reaction vessel is considered as a static equipment.
The reaction vessel is a static equipment, while the agitator on it is a dynamic equipment.
Speaking only of the kettle, it belongs to the category of containers and is a static equipment
The first floor is well-ventilated, but without stirring, there’s no such thing as a reaction vessel. A reaction vessel consists of the vessel body and an agitator; without agitation, it can at most be considered a jacketed tank. Therefore, a vessel is definitely a moving device.