Precautions for using bolts made of 304 and 316 materials

Thread Content

(1) What are the basic differences between 304, 304L, 316, and 316L materials? 304, 304L, 316, and 316L are the stainless steel materials commonly used in flanged joints (including flanges, sealing elements, and fasteners). 304, 304L, 316, and 316L are stainless steel grades designated by the American Material Standards (ANSI or ASTM), and they belong to the 300 series of austenitic stainless steels. The grades corresponding to domestic material standards (GB/T) are 06Cr19Ni10 (304), 022Cr19Ni10 (304L), 06Cr17Ni12Mo2 (316), and 022Cr17Ni12Mo2 (316L). This type of stainless steel is generally referred to as 18–8 stainless steel. As shown in Table 1, 304, 304L, 316, and 316L exhibit different physical, chemical, and mechanical properties due to the various alloying elements used and their respective amounts. Compared to ordinary stainless steels, they possess excellent corrosion resistance, heat resistance, and workability. The corrosion resistance of 304L is similar to that of 304, but due to its lower carbon content compared to 304, it has greater resistance to intergranular corrosion. 316 and 316L are molybdenum-containing stainless steels; due to the addition of molybdenum, their corrosion resistance and heat resistance are superior to those of 304 and 304L. Similarly, since 316L has a lower carbon content than 316, it possesses better resistance to intergranular corrosion. Austenitic stainless steels such as 304, 304L, 316, and 316L have low mechanical strength; the room-temperature yield strength of 304 is 205 MPa, while that of 304L is 170 MPa ； The room-temperature yield strength of 316 is 210 MPa, while that of 316L is 200 MPa. Therefore, the bolts made from them are of low-strength grade. Table 1: Carbon content, %; Yield strength at room temperature, MPa; Recommended maximum operating temperature, °C
304: ≤0.08, 205, 816
304L: ≤0.03, 170, 538
316: ≤0.08, 210, 816
316L: ≤0.03, 200, 538

(2) Why should bolts made of materials such as 304 and 316 not be used in flange joints? As explained in previous sections, flange joints can fail due to two reasons: first, internal pressure causes the sealing surfaces of the flanges to separate, resulting in a reduction in the stress on the gaskets; second, at high temperatures, the gaskets may creep and relax, or the bolts themselves may creep, leading to a decrease in bolt tension and thus a reduction in gasket stress, which in turn causes leakage and failure of the flange joint. In actual operation, bolt force relaxation is inevitable; the initial tightening force of the bolts always decreases over time. Especially in flange joints subjected to high temperatures and severe cyclic conditions, after 10,000 hours of operation, the bolt load loss often exceeds 50%, and this loss continues to increase over time as well as with rising temperatures. When the flange and bolts are made of different materials, especially when the flange is made of carbon steel and the bolts are made of stainless steel, the difference in their thermal expansion coefficients leads to problems. For example, at 50°C, the thermal expansion coefficient of stainless steel (16.51×10-5/°C) is higher than that of carbon steel (11.12×10-5/°C). When the temperature of the device rises, if the flange expands less than the bolts, then after deformation adjustment, the decrease in the elongation of the bolts results in a reduction in the bolt tension, which can lead to leakage at the flange joint. Therefore, when joining high-temperature equipment flanges and pipe flanges, especially when the coefficients of thermal expansion of the flange and bolt materials differ, it is necessary to make the coefficients of thermal expansion of these two materials as similar as possible. As can be seen from (1), austenitic stainless steels such as 304 and 316 have low mechanical strength; the room-temperature yield strength of 304 is merely 205 MPa, while that of 316 is only 210 MPa. Therefore, in order to improve the resistance of bolts to relaxation and fatigue, measures are taken to increase the tightening force of the bolts. As will be discussed in subsequent lectures, when using the maximum allowable tightening force, it is required that the stress on the bolts reach 70% of the yield strength of the bolt material; hence, it is necessary to raise the strength grade of the bolt material by using high-strength or medium-strength alloy steel bolts. It is obvious that, except for cast iron, non-metallic flanges, or rubber gaskets, for flanges with higher pressure ratings or semi-metallic and metallic gaskets that are subject to high stresses, bolts made of low-strength materials such as 304 and 316 fail to meet the sealing requirements due to insufficient bolt strength. August 16–19 [Yantai] The 1st 2023 Symposium on the Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Chemical and Pharmaceutical Industries. It is worth noting here that in the U.S. standards for stainless steel bolt materials, there are two categories each for 304 and 316, namely B8 Cl.1 and B8 Cl.2 for 304, and B8M Cl.1 and B8M Cl.2 for 316. Cl.1 has undergone carbide solid solution treatment, while Cl.2, in addition to solid solution treatment, has also been subjected to strain strengthening treatment. Although there is no fundamental difference between B8 Cl.2 and B8 Cl.1 in terms of chemical resistance, compared to B8 Cl.1, the mechanical strength of B8 Cl.2 is significantly improved. For instance, the yield strength of B8 Cl.2 bolt material with a diameter of 3/4” is 550 MPa, whereas the yield strength of B8 Cl.1 bolt material, regardless of its diameter, is only 205 MPa—a difference of more than twofold. The 06Cr19Ni10 (304) and 06Cr17Ni12Mo2 (316) specified in China’s bolt material standards are equivalent to B8 Cl.1 and B8M Cl.1. [Note: The bolt material S30408 specified in GB/T 150.3 \"Pressure Vessels – Part 3: Design\" is equivalent to B8 Cl.2] ； S31608 is equivalent to B8M Cl.1. For the above reasons, in GB/T 150.3 and GB/T 38343 “Technical regulations for the installation of flange joints”, it is stipulated that bolts made of the conventional 304 (B8 Cl.1) and 316 (B8M Cl.1) materials should not be used for flanges of pressure equipment and pipe flanges. Particularly under high-temperature and severely cyclic operating conditions, they should be replaced with B8 Cl.2 (S30408) and B8M Cl.2 to prevent insufficient bolt tightening force. It is worth noting that when using low-strength bolt materials such as 304 and 316, even during the installation phase, due to a lack of torque control, the bolts may exceed the material’s yield strength or even break. Naturally, if leakage occurs during the pressure test or at the start of operation, even if the bolts are tightened further, the bolt tension will not increase enough to stop the leakage. Furthermore, these bolts cannot be reused after removal, as they have suffered permanent deformation and their cross-sectional dimensions have decreased, making them prone to breaking when reinstalled.