HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

The issue of gas toxicity classification used in design

2009-12-31View Original

Thread Content

Some time ago, I built a methanol separator with a design pressure of 6.1 NPa and a design temperature of 100 degrees Celsius; the working media in it are syngas and crude methanol. Syngas components: H2 66.985% ; CO 10.034% ; CH3OH 0.723% ; CO2 2.782% ; N2 9.957% ; CH4 5.291% ; Ar 4.0835% ; H2O 0.145% ; Hydrogen partial pressure 3.1~4.0 MPa (G). Crude methanol component: CH3OH 96.28% ; H2O 3.72%. The toxicity value shown in the data sheet provided by the manufacturer is classified as highly hazardous, but according to standard specifications and previous methanol separators, it should be considered moderately hazardous. Could someone please tell me which category this should be assigned to? What is a sentence?
Reply #22009-12-31
It should be classified as highly hazardous, based on the H2 content
Reply #32009-12-31
Regarding methanol, although it poses a moderate level of hazard and this equipment is used for methanol separation, both H2 and methanol are flammable and explosive substances; however, H2 is not a toxic substance.
Reply #42009-12-31
Class 3 pressure vessels do not need to be designed as toxic equipment
Reply #52009-12-31
Agree with the opinion on floor 3. Methanol is classified as having moderate hazard, while hydrogen is an explosive and hazardous substance; neither of them reaches the level of high hazard. Perhaps the process is just a reminder for designers to pay attention to it. You can **talk to him**.
Reply #62009-12-31
I also think it should be classified according to methanol’s moderate level of hazard. As for H2, the explosion hazard category indicated in its data sheet refers to it as a flammable and explosive substance; it has nothing to do with toxicity. As for the three types of containers mentioned on the 4th floor, my design corresponds to type two containers; it does not fall under type three

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.