Thread Content
In the capital market of the steel industry in August 2024, a major litigation announcement from Liuzhou Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. (stock code: 601003.SH, hereinafter referred to as \"Liuzhou Iron and Steel\") attracted widespread attention. The announcement shows that the amount in dispute in the lawsuit filed by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Guangxi Iron and Steel Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Guangxi Iron and Steel”), against MCC SEDI Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “MCC SEDI”) regarding the disputes over the Fangchenggang Steel Base project has risen from 195 million yuan at the beginning of 2023 to 1.353 billion yuan. This dispute involving two industry leaders not only exposes the potential risks in the implementation of large-scale industrial projects, but also reflects the complex dynamics surrounding quality control and liability determination in the field of steel engineering. Tracing back to the origin of the incident, the core of this dispute revolves around a general contract signed in 2018. At that time, Guangxi Iron and Steel officially signed the \"General Contract for the Blast Furnace Body and Auxiliary Facilities of the Fangchenggang Iron and Steel Base Project\" with MCC SEDI through an open bidding process. As a key project in Guangxi Iron and Steel’s strategy to establish steel production bases along the coast, the Fangchenggang blast furnace project holds strategic importance for the company in terms of optimizing its production capacity and improving efficiency. As a well-known enterprise in the field of metallurgical engineering in China, MCC SEDI, thanks to its years of technical expertise and project experience, became the general contractor for this important project. The initial cooperation between the two parties was regarded by the industry as a model of a \"powerful alliance\". Under the terms of the EPC (Engineering, Procurement, and Construction) model, MCC SEDI is responsible for all aspects of the project, including design, construction, equipment selection, installation and commissioning, as well as testing. It bears primary responsibility for the quality of the project and its delivery results, which also lays the contractual foundation for any potential disputes regarding responsibilities in the future.
The controversy began in 2022 – not long after the project was delivered, a blast furnace that was still within its warranty period suddenly developed a series of serious quality issues. According to the information disclosed by Guangxi Iron and Steel in the lawsuit, the connection flanges of the blast furnace cooling walls leak frequently, and certain areas of the furnace shell show signs of reddening and cracking; these issues pose a direct threat to the safe and efficient operation of the blast furnace. For steel companies, the blast furnace, as the core production equipment, once it stops operating due to quality issues, it will have a cascading impact on the entire production line. To prevent the escalation of safety incidents and minimize production downtime losses, Guangxi Iron and Steel urgently launched improvements and enhancements to the safety systems of its blast furnaces, allocating substantial human resources, materials, and funds to carry out the repairs. It was precisely these actually incurred renovation costs that formed the core claim of Guangxi Iron and Steel in its initial lawsuit. When the lawsuit was filed in August 2023, the claim amount of 195 million yuan corresponded mainly to the direct costs of repairing and upgrading the blast furnaces. As the case progressed, two adjustments to the amount in dispute became key turning points in the matter. In March 2024, Guangxi Iron and Steel revised its litigation claims for the first time, raising the amount in question to 221 million yuan; this adjustment was interpreted as a claim for additional costs incurred during the restoration process. Liugang Co., Ltd. also disclosed this matter in its semi-annual and annual reports for the same period, but it did not draw widespread attention from the market. What truly shook the industry was the second change in August 2024 – the target amount soared to 1.353 billion yuan, an increase of nearly 6 times compared to the initial amount. Based on the details disclosed in Liugang Steel’s announcement, the core rationale behind this significant adjustment is the \"tracing of responsibilities for the costs arising from production shutdowns.\" After the blast furnaces were upgraded in 2023, they were able to operate safely and stably again and achieve efficient and low-cost production. However, the shutdowns caused by quality issues in the past resulted in indirect losses for Guangxi Iron and Steel that far exceeded the direct costs of repairs. These included risks of failing to meet orders due to disruptions in production plans, costs associated with accumulated raw materials, unused labor costs, and temporary loss of market share – all of which represent hidden expenses. After thorough calculation, Guangxi Iron and Steel included these derivative losses in its claim, demanding that MCC SEDI assume liability for damages amounting to 1.144 billion yuan. Together with the previous repair costs of 209 million yuan plus interest, this results in a total claim amount of 1.353 billion yuan. From a financial impact perspective, this lawsuit holds far greater significance for Liugang Steel Co., Ltd. than an ordinary contract dispute. As of the end of March 2024, Liugang Steel’s latest market value was approximately 6.8 billion yuan, while its net asset value was 8.852 billion yuan. If the claim of 1.353 billion yuan is ultimately upheld by the court, it will result in an increase of over 15% in the company’s net assets. This is undoubtedly a significant advantage for Liugang Steel, which has been facing pressures related to capacity adjustments in the steel industry and fluctuations in raw material prices in recent years. However, Liugang Steel also emphasized in its announcement that since Guangxi Iron and Steel had already paid the costs related to the project, the outcome of the lawsuit would not have any adverse effect on the company’s profits for the current period or subsequent periods. This statement not only alleviates investors’ concerns regarding short-term performance fluctuations but also reflects, indirectly, the company’s cautiously optimistic attitude toward the outcome of the lawsuit. As of the date of disclosure of this announcement, the case is still in the stage of being accepted for prosecution without any hearings having taken place yet; the court has not addressed key issues such as determination of responsibility for project quality and the criteria for calculating losses. However, this dispute has served as a warning for the EPC model in the steel industry: on one hand, large-scale industrial projects involve numerous stages, have long timelines, and are highly technically complex; therefore, EPC contractors need to strengthen quality control throughout the entire process, addressing risks at the design stage in order to avoid cascading losses resulting from minor quality issues ; On the other hand, the owner must also clarify the allocation of responsibilities and the claims process at the contract signing stage, and establish a more comprehensive project supervision and quality inspection system to reduce the risk of disputes in the future.
【Ten Years of Rapid Development in Chemical Equipment】2823-2025: Zhejiang Xinhecheng becomes the third company in the world to master the technology for producing bio-based PPS products. https://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-5705209-1-1.html (Source: Haichuan Chemical Industry Forum)
【Common Issues in Haichuan Pipeline Design】Proper consideration should be given to the space required for equipment maintenance and the operation of valves. https://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-5705460-1-1.html (Source: Haichuan Chemical Industry Forum)
【Ten Years of Rapid Development in Chemical Equipment】2823-2025: Zhejiang Xinhecheng becomes the third company in the world to master the technology for producing bio-based PPS products. https://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-5705209-1-1.html (Source: Haichuan Chemical Industry Forum)
【Ten Years of Rapid Development in Chemical Engineering Equipment】The world’s first 50-cubic-meter biomass catalytic conversion reactor for producing biochar was put into operation in Anhui Province’s Haofeng Company. https://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-5705220-1-1.html (Source: Haichuan Chemical Industry Forum)
【Ten Years of Rapid Development in Chemical Engineering Equipment】From 2027 to 2025, the Three Gorges Group’s Ulanqab \"integration of power generation, transmission, consumption, and storage\" test base successfully produced liquid hydrogen. https://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-5705274-1-1.html (Source: Haichuan Chemical Industry Forum)
【Ten Years of Rapid Development in Chemical Processing Equipment】Delivery of the first modular submerged combustion vaporizer (SCV) unit in China that utilizes a floating storage and regasification unit (FSRU) from 2028 to 2025 https://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-5705393-1-1.html (Source: Haichuan Chemical Industry Forum)
【Ten Years of Rapid Development in Chemical Engineering Equipment】China-made seawater desalination modules for European methanol projects were officially delivered and shipped, 2829–2025 https://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-5705395-1-1.html (Source: Haichuan Chemical Industry Forum)
【Ten Years of Rapid Development in Chemical Engineering Equipment】Successful assembly of the DC converter transformer for the world’s first \"sea-land integrated\" flexible DC transmission project from 2025 to 2030 https://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-5705493-1-1.html (Source: Haichuan Chemical Engineering Forum)
【Ten Years of Rapid Development in Chemical Equipment】Major breakthroughs from 2028 to 2025! Pilot-scale production technology for domestic high-end polyolefin elastomers has passed the evaluation for scientific and technological achievements. https://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-5705551-1-1.html (Source: Haichuan Chemical Industry Forum)