Are open-flame locations and open-flame equipment the same concept? ? ?
Thread Content
Are open-flame locations and open-flame equipment the same concept? ? ?
Why ask that? If you consider location and device to be the same concept, then a location with an open flame and a device with an open flame are the same concept. But in this post, I’m not sure if you can accurately understand the difference between the meanings of \"location\" and \"device\".
This post was last edited by qugd on 2017-1-20 12:36. Why ask this? If you consider location and device to be the same concept, then a location with an open flame and a device with an open flame are the same concept. But I’m not sure if you can accurately understand the difference in meaning between location and device.
Equipment with an open flame is a source of open flame, but a location with an open flame is not necessarily the equipment itself
Same question: For the fire separation distance at locations with an open flame or sparks, does it refer to the equipment itself or the axis of the building?
For the definitions of areas where open flames exist and areas where sparks are generated, please refer to GB50016 sections 2.1.8 and 2.1.9. Open-flame equipment refers to equipment in the production process in which open flames come into contact with the atmosphere. In my opinion, areas where open flames exist should include those equipped with such open-flame devices, as red-hot surfaces also constitute areas where open flames are present
It definitely has to be different; one is the location, and how can the equipment be the same?