HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

What is the energy consumption per unit of output for each of you?

2017-08-01View Original

Thread Content

Colleagues in the air separation industry: In response to the call for energy conservation and the need to improve energy efficiency and corporate profitability, reducing energy consumption in air separation processes within the coal chemical industry is a very positive step. However, based on the current perception of those in the industry, it seems that there is not much awareness regarding the energy consumption associated with air separation processes today, as no one has conducted any relevant statistics on this topic. So, I take the liberty of doing this. The format is as shown in the table below. Serial Number | Scale | Product Type | Circulating Water Volume | High-Pressure Steam | Medium-Pressure Steam | Low-Pressure Steam |
2 | Power Consumption/KW | Year of Commissioning | Product | Output | Temperature | Pressure/MPa | Consumption | Temperature | Pressure/MPa | Consumption | Temperature | Pressure/MPa |
1 | 42,000 | Oxygen 1 | 42,000 | 25 | 8.7 | 16,267.3 t/h | 145 t/h | 525℃ | 8.93 | -50 t/h (transmitted externally via medium-pressure extraction) | 425℃ | 3.92 | 1.9 | Saturated | 1.1 | 5,722.2 | 2013 |
Nitrogen 1 | 33,000 | 25 | 6.2 | Nitrogen 2 | 11,000 | 25 | 0.53 | Nitrogen 3 | 10,000 | 25 | 0.11 | Compressed Air | 3,000 | 25 | 0.6 | Instrument Air | 4,000 | 25 | 0.8 |
2 | 61,000 | Oxygen 1 | 50,982 | 25 | 8.4 | 12,000 t/h | 110 t/h | 525℃ | 8.93 | / | / | / | 2.1 | Saturated | 1.8 | 777.3 | Under construction |
Oxygen 2 | 1,886 | 25 | 1.1 | Oxygen 3 | 8,132 | 25 | 0.8 | Oxygen 4 | – | 25 | 0.25 | Nitrogen 1 | 20 | 25 | 12.1 | Nitrogen 2 | – | 25 | 6.6 | Nitrogen 3 | 910 | 25 | 1.15 | Nitrogen 4 | 9,300 | 25 | 0.52 | Nitrogen 5 | – | 25 | 0.5 | Instrument Air | 3,470 | 25 | 0.85 | Compressed Air | – | 25 | 0.55
Reply #22017-08-04
This set worth 61,000 should be from Hangyang; it’s still an experimental device! If the driving is successful, it will become a milestone for ASU

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.