HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Distance requirements for Class A standard factory rooms

2019-08-28View Original

Thread Content

Colleagues, I’ll get straight to the point! At present, our chemical industrial park is constructing standard factories (Class A), which are primarily intended for use by the fine chemical industry, such as in the production of pharmaceutical intermediates. These factories operate on a leasing basis, and the \"Fire Protection Design Standards for Petrochemical Enterprises\" are applied; the required distance between factories is 30 meters. However, the Ministry of Emergency Management has stated that since each factory belongs to an enterprise, the distance requirements between enterprises do not apply, and instead each factory should be considered as an individual entity, with a required distance of 50 meters! The institutions working with us, such as Sinopharm Wuhan Institute, Hualu, and Tianchen, all recommend designing it at a scale of 30 meters. We would appreciate your advice on how to distinguish between the installations and the enterprise itself Is a standardized factory building with a 30-meter spacing reasonable? Please
Reply #22019-08-28
This issue is prominent in safety assessments; it’s relatively okay for new facilities, but the situation is even worse for those that already exist. There was a case not long ago: different units within one factory complex had been turned into separate companies due to differing ownership structures. When inspections were conducted, those facilities were found to not meet the requirements – a distance of 50 meters was required. With no other option, the company’s ownership structure was changed so that there was only one legal entity; although it remained two companies, they shared the same legal representative, and this allowed them to pass the inspection with a distance of 30 meters between the facilities.
Reply #32019-08-28
Everyone is also welcome to offer suggestions on how to solve this issue; without a solution, renovation, technical upgrades, or structural changes will all pose problems
Reply #42019-08-28
As long as the legal entity for all the standard factory buildings is the same, this problem can be solved; it’s one solution! I heard that Zhejiang does this. . . . It feels like this area is blank.
Reply #52019-08-29
The fire separation distances between adjacent factories and buildings within a factory vary, and it is correct for the emergency management department to enforce these regulations.
Reply #62019-08-29
Does that mean the spacing between factory buildings for fine chemical standards is designed to be 50 meters?
Reply #72019-08-29
In fact, it is recommended not to build standardized industrial parks for Category A and B facilities, especially those involved in the production of fine chemical intermediates; there are many issues involved here: 1. If the facilities are leased out, there will be N separate entities (companies), and fire separation distances must be calculated based on these individual entities. 2. The production processes for products derived from each monomer vary, which in turn results in different requirements regarding the floor space needed. Additionally, areas for storing raw materials, intermediate reaction tanks, and finished products are required; these areas have distinct safety distance requirements, and even some of the equipment itself needs to meet certain safety distances. 3. Each individual building has different fire safety and environmental protection requirements; these cannot all be addressed within one industrial park. In fact, each building needs to have its own fire water tanks, pump rooms, and environmental treatment facilities. .......There are many unforeseen issues; there are also conflicts between building codes and petrochemical industry regulations, and in general design, the higher standard is adopted rather than the lower one. In any case, it is better to divide the plots according to the actual types of companies that will use them, so that relevant requirements can be met as much as possible during future inspections related to safety, environmental protection, fire prevention, etc.
Reply #82019-08-29
To date, no standards have been published for fine chemical enterprises; they have to follow the petrochemical standards. It is recommended to act in accordance with the recommendations of the emergency management department
Reply #92019-09-04
A 50-meter spacing is simply unacceptable; it’s fine to buy land and build there, but it’s impossible to implement this in a standardized industrial park. .
Reply #102019-09-05
If it are different companies, there are different entities responsible for safety; this regulation is aimed at preventing interference between these various responsible entities. As a result, greater safety distances are required. In the case of a single company, the entity responsible for safety is that company itself, and it must carry out internal assessments and controls, meaning that its management responsibilities are greater
Reply #112019-09-05
Current regulations require that you can only proceed in accordance with

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.