The HAZOP of the complete set of equipment is not within the scope of analysis
Thread Content
When conducting a HAZOP analysis on the production process of a certain plant facility, the processes related to the equipment installed there are not covered by the HAZOP analysis, right?
It depends on how it’s divided; we’ve done everything
The key lies in considering the risks and the risk assessment tools used; for example, in the case of a compressor’s lubrication system, FMEA might be more suitable than HAZOP.
It is generally done, but there is no rule specifying it; it falls under the category of something that can be done or not.
Looking at the contract, it generally involves using Hazop for equipment-related tasks; it deals with those deviations related to process parameters, so it’s relatively simple
It should be done; if external conditions change, safety needs to be verified
Complete sets of equipment also need to be taken into consideration
It’s necessary to clarify what kind of complete set of equipment is involved. Those upstairs have already replied; for example, the FMEA for the lubricant station. Also, it’s important to determine whether it’s a new construction, an expansion, or a renovation – you can’t treat them all as the same!
Any production facility requires a HAZOP analysis. I hope this helps you.