Which is more energy-efficient and better, placing the fan of the adsorber before or after adsorption? Why?
Thread Content
Which is more energy-efficient and better, placing the fan of the adsorber before or after adsorption? Why? What different effects will this have on the fan’s performance, such as wind pressure and air volume?
For example, the actual requirement is 1000 m3/h at 20°C with a wind pressure of 3000 Pa
I’ve never seen a fan in front of the adsorption tank; behind the fan is the chimney
What impact do the two have on the performance of the fan?
Considerations should be given to the operating conditions of the adsorber, the pressure and temperature of the gas, its flow rate, the volume of the adsorbent, the required adsorption time, the impact on the substance to be adsorbed, and whether it is conducive to the adsorption process by the adsorber. Is the purpose of this fan only for regeneration? Or absorb harmful elements from the wind? Please make it explicit.
It is the fan that provides power to the adsorber
It is the fan that provides power to the adsorber
This fan is used to allow the exhaust gases to be discharged, right? The gases need to be adsorbed to remove harmful substances before they are released. These gases are quite dangerous before being adsorbed, and the use of a fan increases the risks associated with them (corrosion, gas explosions); after adsorption, the hazards are reduced, making it safer to raise the pressure mechanically. Additionally, after the fan increases the pressure, higher requirements are placed on the airtightness of the system. In terms of energy savings, it requires less electricity when smoke is sent directly into the chimney after passing through the fan