Thread Content
I am from the construction party. We have already started working on the pressure pipeline. Now, the client can’t wait for us to complete the flaw detection and imaging processes; they want to start using the pipeline as soon as possible and introduce materials into it. Yet the special inspection agency has not yet issued a report, and the imaging process is not finished yet. The client is eager to get the pipeline operational. I would like to ask: is the construction party responsible for this, or is it entirely the client’s responsibility? Does it have anything to do with us?
Both Party A and you, Party B, are at fault and will both be punished. The supervision inspections are not yet complete, and the construction itself has not finished either; forcing its use poses serious problems.
You didn’t carry out the project handover, nor is there a project acceptance report; if Party A insists on using it anyway, it is of course their responsibility.
The construction is complete, but the non-destructive testing isn’t finished yet. Now, the client wants to start using the facility secretly. As the construction contractor, what should we do? Should we prevent this from happening, or just let it be? This is really troublesome
If we report it, will we still get the payment for the work?\ud83d\ude30\ud83d\ude30
If we report it, will we still get the payment for the work?\ud83d\ude30\ud83d\ude30
If we report it, will we still get the payment for the work?\ud83d\ude30\ud83d\ude30
If we report it, will we still get the payment for the work?\ud83d\ude30\ud83d\ude30
Since the flaw detection is not complete and the pressure test has not been carried out, it cannot be considered that the construction is finished. If defective welds are detected, they require rework and additional inspection. You can invite inspection agencies to the site to supervise the non-destructive testing, thereby allowing these agencies to identify any instances of the client forcing the use of certain methods.