HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Seeking PID tuning experience

2017-01-04View Original

Thread Content

Recently, while tuning the PID loops of newly installed equipment, I have a few questions I’d like to discuss with everyone: 1. In your company, is PID tuning handled by the process team or by the instrumentation team? Our company specializes in instruments. 2. Are those tuning mnemonics that are widely available online useful? Personally, I don’t think it’s very effective. 3. For those liquid level situations where the response is very slow, in the tower top pressure control loop, one adjustment cycle takes about an hour. Do anyone have any good experience regarding the tuning of such control loops? 3. Besides the temperature loop, can differential effects be applied to the slowly responding levels and pressures?
Reply #22017-01-05
PID is generally adjusted by the instruments in coordination with the process.
Reply #32017-01-05
The tuning mnemonic is useful; adjustments are based on empirical values.
Reply #42017-01-13
Bro, do you have any experience with PID tuning? We could exchange ideas: handshake
Reply #52017-01-17
It can only be said that those with slow reaction times should use differentiation as little as possible
Reply #62017-01-21
A conventional PID control loop usually only requires proportional and integral control
Reply #72017-01-23
The tuning of PID parameters should be determined based on the requirements of the process, with the assistance of instrumentation; Generally, the precision of control and the stability of the system are contradictory; it is necessary to find an appropriate balance. For example, in terms of level control, a level deviation of 5% is acceptable; it is possible to make adjustments and the valve position remains stable, with little impact on the processes upstream and downstream. This makes it a suitable approach, so a proportional control system is sufficient – there is no need to eliminate residual errors or use feedforward control; the main thing is to adjust the proportional coefficient.
Reply #82017-02-04
Personally, I think one should first estimate the feedback cycle roughly and establish a general framework using some rules of thumb; after that, it’s a matter of guessing based on experience. Differentiation is generally used for fine-tuning once stability is achieved.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.