Differences between the two network configuration methods of PCS 7
Thread Content
These are the network configuration methods for two sets of PLC systems: one uses a single Ethernet connection, while the other uses two Ethernet connections. I think network redundancy is primarily achieved through the configuration of switches and network cables. Why go ahead and set up two networks? What are the advantages or substantial differences? Could an actual example be used to illustrate the differences between the two configuration methods? Thank you all!
Dual Ethernet is not organized in this way.
So how should it be assembled? I need guidance – what are the differences between the two configuration methods shown in the diagram? Seeking guidance
There are tutorials on Siemens’ official website; just follow them. Or call customer service directly
Dual Ethernet means that there are 2 network cards per CPU, for a total of 4; two network cards from the slots in two rack sets form one network.
In a control system with a grouped network setup, an Ethernet cable is drawn directly from each of the two CPUs to the switch on-site. What is the difference between this hardware configuration and one in which the Ethernet cable is connected to the switch via a CP443 device? ? Of course, aside from the difference in high costs due to managing multiple projects, are there any other substantial differences? Seeking guidance, thank you
Can two CP443s be connected to a single CPU?
If used to connect to a host computer, the Ethernet port on the CPU has the same function as that of the CP443-1. If it is used for communication between CPUs, the ports on the CPU are different from those of the CP443-1.
If used to connect to a host computer, the Ethernet port on the CPU has the same function as that of the CP443-1. If it is used for communication between CPUs, the ports on the CPU are different from those of the CP443-1.