Thread Content
This post was last edited by Tunaian Clothes on 2017-10-26 at 17:05. 1. Safety Supervision Administration Order No. 3 (2014) 116 – **Guiding Opinions of the State Administration of Work Safety on Strengthening the Management of Safety Instrumented Systems in the Chemical Industry**; 2. Order No. 40 of the State Administration of Work Safety – **Interim Provisions on the Supervision and Management of Key Hazardous Sources of Hazardous Chemicals**. Are there any other regulations besides these two?
According to Document No. 116, if your products fall outside the scope of the two key areas and one major area, you can discuss with safety inspection experts which system to use; in practice, there are still some differences in how this is implemented in different regions.
Thank you to the original poster for sharing; I’ve downloaded it!
There is also Document No. 3 [2013] 88 issued by the Chief Safety Supervisor
If it is an operational plant (involving two key points and one major issue), such as the methyl tert-butyl ether plant that was built and put into operation in 2004, experts requested the installation of a SIS in January 2019. Is it necessary? I don’t think Document No. 116 requires older installations to be equipped with SIS~~ (Articles 14 and 15 of Document No. 116)
Newly built projects and existing installations that do not have safety instrumented systems in place or that have not undergone SIL classification will not be issued a new Safety Production License.