Discuss which is better, Coriolis mass flowmeters or those from E+H?
Thread Content
Our factory uses Coriolis mass flowmeters, and since operations resumed, 3 of them have developed problems in a row (they were installed 5 years ago before being put into use). The first one showed error messages such as Application error; over range A; over range B; Sensor exceeding limit. The manufacturer came and said the sensor was broken. A few days later, two more units developed problems; the error reported was an Application error, the pipeline flow was present, but the flow meter showed a reading of 0. I just want to know what the quality of Kolon’s mass flow meters is like How is it compared to E+H?
Currently, the leading manufacturers of mass flowmeters are Emerson, E+H, Coriolis, and Yokogawa
Emerson’s mass flowmeters are stable, and its after-sales service is good as well； The mass flow meter from Cologne is used in environments with vibrations, and in the past we have encountered inaccurate flow readings.
The argument in favor of the second floor is more or less the same
There is actually no such thing as a quality ranking. When selecting a measuring instrument, it is necessary to choose it properly, install it correctly, and maintain it properly. It has been in use for 5 years without any problems; was it properly maintained during that time, and have there been any accidental damages? It is not needed for installation on pipelines, as accidental damage to pipelines, the medium, or due to human factors is quite common. This has almost nothing to do with product quality; it is a matter of how the company manages and maintains the instruments on site. .