Thread Content
In recent years, oil field stations and depots (transfer stations, combined stations, valve bank stations, gathering and transportation pump stations, water injection stations). . ) Unmanned, remote monitoring is widely adopted, but for stations and facilities that handle crude oil and natural gas, the systems come equipped with SIS or ESD functions. According to regulatory requirements, on-site measurement and control along with remote monitoring are generally the only options allowed. Due to the large size of oil fields, optical fibers and communication equipment are used for data transmission; remote monitoring alone is acceptable, but full remote control is not permitted by the regulations. However, the management argued that if satellites and missiles can be used to exert control across the atmosphere, why can’t we do the same? My question is, how to resolve the conflict between standards and on-site requirements? Are there any new standards and implementation patterns?
Military standards are high, and the means used to maintain these standards are beyond what is available in civilian applications. Wireless control relies on encrypted channels dedicated to military satellites, and civilian systems certainly cannot compare. Your standards are probably those of the petrochemical industry. Rules are made by humans; if it is possible to achieve greater benefits while ensuring safety, then the existing rules will be replaced. Maybe it depends on you, the original poster