The director who needs to sign a contract with the team leader
Thread Content
Over the past month, the company has been in maintenance mode; two meetings are held in the workshop every day. The afternoon meeting is essentially an opportunity for each team leader to report on the daily workload, which I refer to as reporting production volume. During the meeting this afternoon, when it was my turn to report the production figures, one of the items listed was \"Inspection of dozens of manual valves in a certain process.\" Suddenly, the supervisor said that he wanted to sign a contract with me tomorrow; if, due to issues related to these valve inspections, there were any problems, I would be fined 200 yuan each time. I was very surprised and raised my objections on the spot, but the supervisor waved his hand and said we would discuss it tomorrow. Background information: This valve detector is installed on the process manual valve and connected via a shaft. The electrical component used is a proximity switch. Within the year prior to the inspection, there were several instances of interlocks occurring due to improper process operations, inadequate functioning of the valve detector, or deformation of the shaft; none of these interlocks were caused by faults in the valve detector itself. Tomorrow, I plan to reply to the director as follows: 1: Is such a contract signed with all team leaders? \"The instruments in the areas under the responsibility of other process team leaders also require similar valve inspections.\" 2: In the past, there was not a single instance where interlocks failed due to problems with the instruments themselves; if in the future interlocks fail not because of loose wiring or loose brackets in the instruments, but rather due to process-related issues, then is this amount of 200 reasonable?
Can the monitor control this?
Putting the technical issues aside, what’s important here is that the relationship between the team leader and the supervisor doesn’t seem to be good; otherwise, why would such an arrangement come into being? The relationship between superiors and subordinates is a very crucial aspect of the workplace, as it directly affects one’s career prospects. I urge careful consideration before taking any action.
It is estimated that questioning the supervisor in this way will result in a confrontation between the two of them, and generally the subordinate will be at a disadvantage.
This is the leader shirking responsibility and deliberately looking for faults; who can guarantee that the instruments won’t fail? If the instrument is working fine, then what’s the need for an instrument technician? There is also no need to have a gauge chief. If it’s a private company and you still want to stay, brother, just endure it
It’s really easy for this supervisor to do their job – they shift all the responsibility to those below them; in that case, even a dog could take on this supervisor’s role
Punch the dog. . . If you don’t beat the dog, it won’t be well-behaved. . . Use a large wrench to dig and flatten the dog’s head. . . :P :P :P .
Revolution! Go and borrow two weapons from Boss He, let’s get to work – working in shifts of three – and carry the revolution through to the end. :lol
In any company, those who are subordinate to their leaders end up suffering losses. If our leader tells you that this matter will be included in the year-end KPI assessments, then it’s far more than just 200 times over.
A higher-ranking official can crush anyone; brother, bear with it