Thread Content
Currently, in our unit, Anubaa is used to measure 4 kilograms of steam; when there is a deviation in the flow rate, a three-valve assembly is employed to remove the accumulated liquid. However, after doing so, the flow rate deviation becomes even greater. What could be the reason for this? I hope experts can help explain it.
This one. . . . One has to wait until the condensate fills the pressure guide tube. . .
What was said above makes sense: once the accumulated liquid is removed, steam condensation will continue to produce water that remains. If the amount of condensation on each side is different, the error will be greater; it will be better if the tubes are completely filled
Keep waiting; the fluid levels in the pressure conduits on both sides are the same.
Temperature, installation direction? Integrated? Split?
Installed at a 45-degree angle, Rosemount’s Arnova——3051SFA
There is no pressure guide tube; it’s a direct-insert type 3051SFA Ampera, with a three-valve assembly connected to it below. It seems that once the fluid in both sides is drained, the balance is disrupted, and it’s necessary to wait until the fluid levels stabilize again; it appears that draining the fluid doesn’t solve the problem. Thank you all!
Should I switch to a vortex street type or go with the Yokogawa DY instead?
I remember the angle being downward at less than 45 degrees, with the transmitter below
This post was last edited by waneng on 2018-11-27 at 16:21. While ensuring the correct installation method, it is also necessary to check the range of the transmitter and whether squaring is applied.