Process Engineering Division – Instrumentation and Automation Section – Daily Question – Question from 2020-11-14
Thread Content
This post was last edited by It will be better tomorrow on 2020-11-17 07:44 in the Process Engineering Section – Instrumentation and Control Category – Daily Question – Question No. 2020-11-14. Discussion topic: 296. Under conditions that meet the requirements, would you choose a magnetic float level gauge or a glass plate level gauge? Please briefly explain the reason.
Choose a magnetic float level gauge – safe and sensitive
Glass plate level gauges have a lower failure rate compared to magnetic float level gauges; they provide a more accurate indication of the actual liquid level, and are also easier to maintain.
If a glass plate level gauge is available, it should be used as it is simple and practical.
Glass plate level gauges have a lower failure rate compared to magnetic float level gauges; they provide a more accurate indication of the actual liquid level, and are also easier to maintain.
Glass plate level gauges have a lower failure rate compared to magnetic float level gauges; they provide a more accurate indication of the actual liquid level, and are also easier to maintain.
If the level gauge is installed at a high position, then a magnetic flip gauge must be used to facilitate observation; unless a light is installed in the glass tube to indicate red for liquid and green for air, so as to make observation easier.