HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of the two Fox positioners

2021-01-07View Original

Thread Content

The Foss LOGIC520MD model without a screen has a high failure rate when used in cold regions, while the version with a screen is prone to getting damp in coastal areas; overall, its failure rate remains quite high. There are quite a few options; the LOGIC3200MD is a good choice as it has a low failure rate. Which of these two positioners has been updated? Are the devices used by experts like Shuoshuo prone to malfunctions? Are the 3200 series good?
Reply #22021-01-08
I have used the LOGIX 3200 model; I have three or four units of it, and so far no problems have occurred. I haven’t used that other model yet
Reply #32021-01-08
I have used the LOGIX 3200 model; I have three or four units of it, and so far no problems have occurred. I haven’t used that other model yet
Reply #42021-01-08
I have used the LOGIX 3200 model; I have three or four units of it, and so far no problems have occurred. I haven’t used that other model yet
Reply #52021-01-09
We’re all using 420 and 3800
Reply #62021-02-02
First of all, in terms of price, the 3200 is much more expensive than the 520MD+. So, in terms of performance and additional features, it will definitely be better than the 520. Actually, Foss also has a D30 locator with good value for money, which you might want to take a look at as well. The biggest advantage of this locator is its durability and low failure rate. If you need specific information, you can contact me by email. 13971583580@139.com
Reply #72021-02-02
First of all, in terms of price, the 3200 is much more expensive than the 520MD+. So, in terms of performance and additional features, it will definitely be better than the 520. Actually, Foss also has a D30 locator with good value for money, which you might want to take a look at as well. The biggest advantage of this locator is its durability and low failure rate. If you need specific information, you can contact me by email. 13971583580@139.com
Reply #82021-02-02
Our factory uses 3200 models
Reply #92021-02-03
The D30 can replace the 3200; the positioners are generally interchangeable. If it’s convenient, you might as well buy a few to see how they work
Reply #102021-02-03
Our company used 3200 models in the past; they were expensive and fragile. Later, we tried a D30 model, which is more durable and comes at a more affordable price
Reply #112021-02-03
The Logix3200 series is good; it belongs to Fuchs’ high-end range of positioners. The D30 series is also a good option; it is a mature product that was introduced by Ford in recent years, offering comprehensive features at a favorable price. We have used both of them.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.