HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Is a flexible hose necessary for unloading ethanol?

2017-05-31View Original

Thread Content

Urgent question: Is it necessary to use a dip pipe for unloading ethanol? There are hoses, right? Are there any relevant regulations?
Reply #22017-05-31
For safety reasons, to prevent fires
Reply #32017-06-01
No problem, we unload our methanol using hoses.
Reply #42017-06-01
It seems that currently it is required that the unloading of toxic liquids and liquefied gases must be done using dip pipes
Reply #52017-06-01
Ethanol is classified as a Class A liquid and is flammable; its vapors can form explosive mixtures with air. A closed pipeline system should be used for unloading it into storage tanks.
Reply #62017-06-01
For flammable liquids of Class A B, Class B, and Class C A, the trench unloading system is strictly prohibited. For flammable liquid media prone to static electricity accumulation, loading by top spraying is strictly prohibited. For Class A B and Class B A liquid media, a top-sealed cap-type submerged impactor with a return air pipeline should be used; the end of the vertical tube shall be equipped with a diverter, and the vertical tube must be lowered to the bottom of the tank before filling. Excerpted from \"Technical Requirements for Liquid Loading and Unloading Arms\"
Reply #72017-06-14
The purpose of using a flexible hose for unloading goods is to take into account the fact that such hoses offer good static electricity conductivity, excellent sealing properties, and ease of use, making them widely applicable for the loading and unloading of various hazardous chemicals. If a hose is used, it goes without saying whether it meets the regulations or not; due to safety considerations, static electricity discharge simply cannot be achieved. Considering the risk of flash explosions caused by the evaporation of oil and gas, it is advisable not to take such risks.
Reply #82019-05-05
Unloading with flexible hoses is definitely safer than using flexible pipes; we can also achieve automated, airtight unloading
Reply #92019-05-05
For safety reasons, it is better to use flexible hoses, especially during the summer when temperatures are high and organic substances evaporate more readily! ! !
Reply #102019-05-05
Unloading booms offer higher safety, are easy to operate, reduce the labor intensity for personnel, and keep overall costs under control; hoses are not recommended for long-term use.
Reply #112019-05-06
Loading and unloading with flexible hoses is relatively safe; the safety risks associated with hoses are too great!

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.