Pile foundation engineering – which is more efficient, static pressure piles or driven piles?
Thread Content
Pile foundation engineering – which is more efficient, static pressure piles or driven piles?
It should be a driven pile, with high frictional resistance.
Isn’t high resistance meant to result in lower efficiency? ? ? ?
Piles experience high frictional resistance underground, providing uplift resistance.
12 hammer-driven prestressed tubular piles per day per floor, 30 static-pressure prestressed tubular piles per day per floor,
Endurance varies depending on the ground conditions.
It seems they only care about costs and not about efficiency. The missing time will be made up for by working harder later.
For static pressure piles, it’s 150 yuan per meter
In terms of overall efficiency, does driving a static pressure pile move more slowly?
As the saying goes, it takes 3 minutes to drive piles, but 3 hours to move the machine.
There is no single better type of pile foundation; the choice depends mainly on the specific conditions at the construction site. For example, the methods used for construction in sandy areas differ from those used in desert regions.