Thread Content
How can one register as a chemical engineer at such a low cost? No one wants to hire them; it’s difficult to find a job, and the salary is low. There are many tasks and heavy responsibilities. How can fairness in this world be defined?
Stop looking; fairness doesn’t exist
This post was last edited by tiyiss on 2015-6-19 16:27. My understanding of this issue is as follows: 1. The world is generally fair, but it’s not possible for fairness to prevail at all times, nor can it be guaranteed for every individual. 2. Every industry/market develops in a cyclical manner; after a peak comes a trough, and after the trough comes another peak. 3. No matter which path you choose, the moment no one else can take your place is the time to reap the rewards. What do you think?
The original poster is right! I think obtaining this certificate is a demonstration of one’s actual skills – it’s just a way to show that off! But it doesn’t mean that without this certificate one’s abilities are inferior to those of others! The main purpose of getting this certificate is to gain recognition from peers; in other words, it serves as a stepping stone for changing jobs! But that doesn’t mean having this certificate guarantees anything! Our company laid off employees this year; just the registered chemical engineers were removed, and there were over 20 registered electrical engineers as well!
In my opinion, the belief that knowledge can change one’s own life is a wrong worldview; what matters for making money isn’t how much knowledge you have, but rather your skills and your network of connections. Give up; those who believe that knowledge can change everything can wake up now.
Knowledge is originally empty! The key is how you fill it in and structure it!
If you want to make money, working in technology definitely won’t earn you much!
Our company is the same; a large number of registered engineers and registered first-class construction engineers went back home, and even more people with other types of certifications did so as well. . .