HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

How are the performance of ABB’s pressure and differential pressure transmitters?

2015-07-17View Original

Thread Content

How are the performance of ABB’s pressure and differential pressure transmitters? Can it be used in refining plants? How is it compared to the EJA?
Reply #22015-07-17
Transmitter technology is mature, and ordinary instrument manufacturers are able to produce them, let alone large companies; the quality should be fine. EJA has a greater reputation.
Reply #32015-07-18
If used frequently, the quality should still be fine
Reply #42015-07-18
ABB’s pressure and differential pressure transmitters enjoy greater reputation in terms of performance than those of EJA
Reply #52015-07-18
YAMATAKE, the Japanese company Azbil Yamatake, has many joint ventures in Japan that use the red Azbil logo; Metso’s DCS systems, ND9100 series controllers, as well as other measuring instruments and mechanical equipment hold a significant market share in the paper industry
Reply #62015-07-18
Regarding pressure and differential pressure transmitters, in terms of quality and brand, those from Rohm and Yokogawa are considered the best; as for market share, technical level of the products, and their applications, users are well aware of this. The second tier basically consists of the A family, the Huo family, the Ximen family, and the En-Hao family; it can be said that the A family and the Huo family are in a better position. Additionally, there are some domestic small brands that offer good quality, but their technical level is inferior to that of foreign brands due to a lack of support for core microelectronics research and development as well as long-term reliability. Those that have obtained SIL2 certification must have quite good products.
Reply #72015-07-18
I knew right away that ABB’s positioners were terrible. Among the 11 types of positioners we use here, only two tend to have problems, and one of them is from ABB
Reply #82015-07-18
The ABB has an elegant appearance, but its performance is poor; it is slightly inferior to the EJA.
Reply #92015-07-19
Here’s some experience from the power industry: in terms of the instruments themselves, there are no issues at all. However, since their performance is not as good as Rosemount’s, the professionalism of their pre-sales and after-sales staff is also slightly lower, and there are times when things are not clear. . .
Reply #102015-07-20
ABB’s products generally have good quality. For pressure and differential pressure transmitters, they are also good options, with many applications in the paper industry.
Reply #112015-07-20
Another victim of a home-use ABB positioner;;P

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.