HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Which is more efficient, an intermediate extraction turbine or a full condenser turbine?

2015-09-06View Original

Thread Content

Which is more efficient, an intermediate extraction turbine or a full condenser turbine? How can they be compared? Assuming the intake parameters are the same, the volume of air is the same, and the output power is the same, who draws in more air? Whose efficiency is high?
Reply #22015-09-06
On the one hand, the heating unit supplies steam of specified quality to heat users, and on the other hand, it also provides electricity to those users. Part or all of the (backpressure) steam, after performing a certain amount of work in the turbine, is extracted at the extraction point and supplied to heat users, rather than being discharged to the condenser; as a result, the loss of cooling capacity is reduced, and its efficiency is therefore much higher than that of a conventional condensing turbine.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.