Thread Content
Regarding the marketization of major overhaul tasks for some new chemical enterprises, the maintenance of large-scale equipment requires outsourcing – either by turning to equipment manufacturers or by choosing specialized maintenance companies. We invite all members to actively discuss: which approach is the best? Perhaps there is a better way: generous rewards should be given for posts that are insightful and thorough.
Choosing a device manufacturer can be a bit tricky; how many options should be considered? Moreover, it’s difficult to get help on demand; it’s more reasonable to choose a professional maintenance company.
The maintenance of large-scale units needs to be outsourced; it is better to choose equipment manufacturers who are professional and provide genuine spare parts.
I think it is better to have professional maintenance companies carry out the repairs, for the following reasons: 1. Professional maintenance companies can ensure timely arrival of their staff, whereas manufacturers cannot be stationed at your location on a long-term basis; 2. Professional maintenance companies carry out the maintenance work; a single team can handle the maintenance of various types of equipment, or even all the equipment in a plant, while manufacturers can only maintain the equipment they produce themselves ; 3. In terms of maintenance costs, professional maintenance companies generally incur lower expenses than manufacturing manufacturers. Regarding the issue of accessories mentioned above, the company can simply purchase them from the manufacturer, so this is not the main problem. The main issue is likely to lie in the quality of maintenance work. When it comes to maintenance carried out by the manufacturer, they will carefully examine the causes of the problems and find ways to resolve them, in order to prevent similar issues from occurring in the future ; Secondly, since it is equipment manufactured by them own, in order to prove that the equipment itself has no problems and can operate for long periods of time, the quality of their maintenance work is generally quite high. Professional maintenance companies are not necessarily the case; therefore, for such companies, if measurement is involved, I recommend assigning professionals to oversee the maintenance process in order to ensure the quality and progress of the work. If guaranteed shipping is used, this problem can be avoided by setting a operating cycle for each type of equipment; appropriate rewards are given for those that operate within their designated cycle, while an analysis is conducted to determine the reasons for those that fall short of the normal operating cycle – whether it is due to poor maintenance quality or operational errors – and corresponding actions are taken. With guaranteed shipping, since the payment is fixed, if you maintain high quality in repairs and ensure a long operational lifespan, then you can earn money effortlessly ; Your technical skills are inadequate, the quality of maintenance is poor, and the equipment fails to reach its intended operational lifespan; not only do you need to carry out the maintenance work, but you will also be fined. I think that by making comparisons and incorporating a reward and punishment system, it is possible to enhance the sense of responsibility among maintenance personnel, which should be a favorable situation for maintenance work.
I also think it’s better to have professionals do professional tasks
This is how we do it: if the equipment has just been put into use and is undergoing its first major repair, one should turn to the manufacturer, and a list should be provided, as you don’t know what components are needed for the equipment, nor their prices or the quality of the repair work. Once you’re familiar with everything, then seek out professional repair teams. If their repair skills, the prices of the components, and the quality of those components are satisfactory, then they can be designated as long-term suppliers.
It is more reasonable to choose a professional maintenance company.
In my opinion, it’s better to turn to the equipment manufacturers for the maintenance of large-scale units. Such units have complex structures and numerous components, and the manufacturers are familiar with the structure and principles of these devices as well as the vulnerable parts involved. This ensures more thorough maintenance, and they will also pay more attention to the upkeep of the equipment themselves.
In my opinion, the maintenance of large-scale units should be carried out by the original professional installation company, as such companies have a good understanding of these devices, which ensures higher quality in the maintenance work.
I think it’s better to find qualified professionals for the repairs; there will be no issues with the technical aspects, and for any parts that need to be replaced, Party A can simply order them from the manufacturer. Some domestic equipment manufacturers I have come across are inefficient and provide poor service
The last edit to this post was made by zhangya*ong on 2015-9-24 at 17:07. There is no unified approach to the maintenance of chemical processing equipment; some manufacturers train a portion of their own staff for such tasks, while outsourcing the maintenance of the remaining equipment; Some manufacturers outsource all maintenance work. So, regarding outsourcing maintenance tasks, whether to turn to professional repair teams or the equipment manufacturers, I have the following opinions: 1. For routine inspections and daily maintenance of equipment, I don’t think it’s necessary to rely on equipment manufacturers. They charge high fees, some of them are inefficient, and not necessarily highly skilled. Equipment manufacturers focus mainly on assembling new devices; when it comes to maintaining already in use equipment, they may not be as competent as professional repair teams. 2. Equipment manufacturers can only repair their own equipment. For example, a turbine compressor consists of a compressor, a turbine, and a gearbox; if these components are provided by three different manufacturers, then it will be necessary to enlist the help of personnel from all three companies for repairs. This leads to many problems – overlapping tasks increase the risk of errors, and it is also very difficult to manage such situations. 3. Professional repair teams are exposed to a wide variety of equipment types, enabling them to carry out routine maintenance on different kinds of equipment in a systematic manner. This makes it easier for companies to manage such operations, and the costs are relatively lower as well. Of course, when looking for a professional repair team, it’s best to choose an enterprise with the necessary qualifications and a track record. In summary, individuals tend to seek professional repair teams.