Thread Content
This post was last edited by WindBlowingButtCool on 2015-10-9 at 12:51. As the title suggests, in public settings at different times and locations, technicians A, B, C, and D had the following conversation with their same supervisor: 1. At the end stage of the shutdown and purging process of the equipment, the supervisor asked technician A: “Can we stop the purging steam now?” A replies: Stop it, if you say to stop, I’ll stop right away! Immediate superior: If you say it can be stopped, then it can be stopped; I’ll follow your advice! A: No, no, no – you’re the boss; I’ll follow your instructions... Direct supervisor: I’ll follow your instructions... A: Boss, please don’t shorten my lifespan, okay? I can’t stand hearing that... 2. The equipment has just been overhauled and is now in the initial stage of operation. The same direct supervisor asks technician B: Can the blind flange that isolates the reaction and distillation units be removed? B’s reply: Tear it down. If you say so, contact the team and I’ll bring it over right away to have it torn down! Immediate supervisor: I’m asking if you can take it apart. B’s reply: If you say it can be taken apart, then it can be taken apart. Immediate supervisor: I was wondering if you could break it down. Response: Sure, I can break it down; just tell me to do it and I’ll do it right away. Immediate supervisor: I’d like to ask for your opinion. B’s reply: Oh! Ask me for my opinion; I need to consult my supervisor first. Direct supervisor: I think we should tear it down first, so as to avoid complications later on during the demolition process. . . B’s reply: Oh, I see. My opinion is not to remove it; I’m worried that interactions between reactions and distillation processes could cause problems. That would be interesting, because during start-up, shutdown, and maintenance periods, I only trust blind flanges, not valves... The direct supervisor: Oh, okay, then I won’t remove it for now... B’s reply: It’s fine; whether to remove it or not depends on your decision... 3. During normal production, a problem arose in one of the pipelines due to the negligence of technician C, which led to criticism from senior management: Why did such a thing happen? Immediate boss: I don’t know about this? I wasn’t at the scene; it wasn’t me who handled it! Top leader: How could you not know? Immediate supervisor: I don’t know when this pipeline will be available! ! No one told me about this pipeline, so I had no idea! I don’t know either why there’s this wire. Technician C replied right away: I don’t know either; no one told me about this wire... so I really don’t know! The top leader was speechless....... 4. There was a problem with the device. My direct supervisor said to D, “Go and fix that!” D’s reply: How should it be handled? My direct supervisor said, \"Go and handle it, go ahead!\" D’s reply: I can go, but the key is how to handle it – is there a plan? Immediate supervisor: There’s no plan; I don’t know how to handle this either. D: Then just do whatever you think is the right thing to do! 5. Management Department A assigned tasks to the direct supervisor, who then passed them on to D. D prepared a list of tasks that required cooperation from other departments as well as an outline of the existing problems, and sought help from the direct supervisor. Direct supervisor: Go and contact those other departments to handle it! ... D’s reply: Contact other departments, but whom? Immediate supervisor: Of course, it’s necessary to get in touch with the leaders of other departments, the people in charge... D’s reply: I’m just a minor employee; even the leaders in my own department don’t know me. Please go and contact them! Immediate supervisor: Then contact Department A. It was they who assigned you this task, so go to them! D: Oh, I see. Well, just wait then; I’m not in a hurry....... Manager’s discussion group
222222222222222222222222222222222
The technicians are a bit sad! Spending a lifetime as a technical specialist is truly a tragic fate. But if I’m not going to hell, then who will!
These days, the gap between employees and managers is growing larger, and the reasons are complex! It’s not entirely the workers’ fault that they lack enthusiasm for working; leaders need to think more about this, as after all, it is the leaders who play a leading role.
One should not follow a leader’s words blindly; it is necessary to adhere to the principles of craftsmanship. I need to explain the situation to the manager.
I am a process operator; I only carry out the correct, technical instructions from those in a higher position than me. Administrative orders cannot be directly implemented in production. This is a principle: for incorrect instructions, one should report them to superiors and explain the reasons. As for instructions that are not serious issues or those that result in inefficiency, I choose to carry them out. As a commander, you should think carefully when you see unexpected results, right? You must bear the consequences of wrong instructions and bypassing hierarchical authority.
Is the factory that complicated? The workers do their jobs diligently; I believe the management won’t act recklessly, after all, isn’t the objective reality quite clear?
Leaders, please do not give orders bypassing higher authorities! Illegal command!
Those in technical fields fear this precisely; on either end of a decision lie conscience and responsibility.
Technicians should have their own integrity. Pay close attention to safety! You can’t allow a leader to give illegal instructions – how can you just stand by and do nothing! Especially for critical operations, it’s not something that can be done just because a supervisor says it’s possible; some operating procedures and safety protocols were established at the cost of blood!