HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

It’s a simple question, but it’s not clear how to explain it

2015-11-11View Original

Thread Content

Everyone is probably familiar with Bernoulli’s equation; in simple terms, the faster the flow rate, the lower the pressure. Essentially, it’s the law of conservation of energy, but there’s a contradiction I haven’t been able to figure out. Suppose there is a main pipe that supplies water outward, and there is a control valve on the end of this main pipe. When we open the control valve wider, the flow rate increases compared to before. This results in a decrease in the pressure of the main pipe; in other words, it is the situation where the flow rate is high and the pressure is low. But as everyone knows, when the control valve remains unchanged and the flow rate is to be increased, the only way is to raise the pressure, that is, to increase the pressure in the main pipe. Once the pressure in the main pipe increases, the flow rate rises as well, and the flow velocity becomes faster. These two theories are not contradictory; the first one deals with the relationship between flow rate and pressure, while the second deals with the relationship between flow rate and pressure difference (drop). Theoretically, they are not incompatible. However, from my analysis, in the second scenario, as the flow rate increases, the pressure in the main pipe should decrease – so why does it increase? Here, we need to analyze how the point for determining the pressure difference is chosen. Simply put, the pressure in my main pipe has increased. From this perspective, since the source of pressure has increased, the pressure difference should increase as well, which in turn results in a faster flow rate. If we consider only the pressure in the main pipe, an increase in pressure would lead to a decrease in flow rate. It’s quite contradictory, isn’t it? I’m not sure whether there’s an issue with the selection of the analysis points or with my understanding of certain definitions. It’s a simple question, but I just can’t figure it out. I hope my friends from Haichuan can explain to me where I went wrong.
Reply #22015-11-12
Classmate, your idea is too idealistic. In reality, the main pipe is indeed capable of continuing to supply fluid – for example, pumps can be used to add fluid to it in order to keep its pressure from dropping. This isn’t a case of simple conservation of energy, as there is energy input as well

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.