[Share Tencent News] It would take 50 billion to possibly relocate a state-owned chemical company
Thread Content
http://view.inews.qq.com/a/NEW2015111601585905 [Introduction] Gaqiao Petrochemical, located in Shanghai and affiliated with Sinopec, has experienced numerous accidents in recent years, and there have been repeated rumors about its potential relocation or even closure. But there has been no activity yet. It was not until recently that the media reported that Shanghai planned to offer compensation of 50 billion yuan, and only then did the possibility become apparent. Behind the difficulties in relocating Takahashi Petrochemical lies a reflection of the challenges in addressing China’s \"chemical industry siege\" problem. For more details, please check Tencent News at the link. What is the purpose of such state-owned enterprises? To make profits? For the welfare of the people? Promote social development? Create job opportunities?
:Lol, just shut it down directly. . **Isn’t that amazing? It’s just like the demolition team – they block things off, cut off power, and seal off roads. . .
There are so many historical reasons, especially in Shanghai – it’s hard to even explain them all. But the biggest issue is money; with land prices being so high in Shanghai, can one just move away easily?
How did the factory end up being built here in the first place? Takahashi Petrochemical was established in 1981, while Sinopec was founded in 1983. Who surrounds the enterprise?
If a company is managed well, avoids frequent accidents, reduces emissions and pollution, and coexists harmoniously with the public, then there will be no problems. But companies can’t meet these conditions!
I have been to Shanghai’s Takahashi Petrochemical. WO. It’s a really good factory
It develops rapidly, and the original location becomes a prime spot, so the price goes up
It can only be said that society is developing too rapidly; it cannot be considered a problem caused by chemical companies surrounding a particular area.
Today’s situation was created by the government itself, but it is the ordinary people who end up bearing the losses. Unrestrained expansion of production capacity, real estate development, reliance on land-based revenue sources, and excessive local government debt are akin to the enclosure movements in 15th-century England; in the end, it is still the government officials who benefit, while it is the ordinary people who suffer. . .
Times are evolving. At the beginning of factory construction, indeed great contributions were made; it can be said that a large number of jobs, both visible and invisible, were created at that time. However, as people’s living standards have improved, they no longer want factories in their vicinity. Yet, past development has been centered around chemical plants, and it would be inappropriate to abandon such facilities – we need to be objective