Cyclone separation software design
Thread Content
Neither the calculation model for cyclone separators nor the ASPEN calculation software takes into account the wall thickness of the outlet pipe. The wall thickness of the outlet pipe has a significant impact on the design; how can this impact be accounted for in the calculations?； What are the regulations regarding the tangential velocity of the inner vortex? What are the requirements for the number of rotations?
This post was last edited by luoli519 on 2016-10-12 at 17:25. It refers to non-professional dynamic separation design system platforms – not only ASPEN, but also many software programs for cyclone separator design such as Hoffman, Obermair, Greif, etc. These systems do not take into account the wall thickness of the inlet and outlet pipes of cyclone separators; they also fail to consider the impact of the inlet pipe structure under medium and high pressure conditions on the formation of secondary swirls, the negative effect of secondary swirls on separation efficiency, and the influence of the inlet pipe structure on pressure drop. In these aspects, NOVEL Company demonstrates its more comprehensive technical capabilities and advantages as a company specializing in dynamic separation technologies.