Another reply to a colleague on WeChat
Thread Content
@X world X X, my device is designed for light oil, with a 55% reduction in weight. The formulation of Nanpasikeda was reduced by 57%, that was when I was in charge. Later, after the unit was modified, the yield of light oil from sand refining remained reduced by 50%, and the yield when blending it with Nanpas also remained reduced by 50%. Light oil can no longer be obtained; the research department needs to work on finding a solution. But with the current state of this renovation, it can only go in a worse direction. Light oil, which cannot be extracted in large quantities through atmospheric and vacuum distillation, is used as a catalytic feedstock; the large amount of gas generated during cracking occupies space in the reactor, and a significant amount of oil slurry is discharged, making it difficult to increase the yield of the catalytic process. In the past, our heating furnaces relied on burning a large amount of heavy oil, but now we use a lot of gas instead. Refining processes convert light oil into gas, which is quite strange; how is it still possible to increase the yield of light oil? Let’s wait and see next year!
Why isn’t anyone stepping up? Improving equipment only leads to worse performance; it does not increase efficiency. Only by appointing the right people for reforms can efficiency be improved.
Everything should have a soul. There must be a center. Especially in technology, there must be a top expert.
This post was last edited by mpcchuang on 2015-12-16 17:14 *to teach us； Without the correct political perspective, it is as if one has no soul. Political work is the lifeline of all economic activities. These are the *quotes I learned in the fifth grade of elementary school. For a company to achieve sustainable development, it must consistently pursue a path of low-carbon and environmentally friendly practices while improving its efficiency. If those in power within a company engage in reckless manipulation of power, how can the company develop? Looking back at China decades ago, the ’Gang of Four’ pushed the economy to the brink of collapse. There is no correct political viewpoint; the superstructure hinders economic development. Only through reform can the superstructure be adapted to economic development, thereby having a positive impact on the economic foundation. The economic base determines the superstructure, and our designer, Lao Deng, has achieved this. Now, enterprises are also facing **the same problems they once encountered; reform is the only option. Remember Mao’s wise insight: political work is the lifeline of all economic activities.
Old man, I’ve read many of your posts; they all talk about people with talent who haven’t had the chance to showcase it, just like someone in my factory. Some of those posts are written after the fact. Such an amazing person – why doesn’t he consider whether there might be something wrong with the way he does things? It would be great to find a different way of doing things so that the leader can give you the opportunity to showcase your talents
This post was last edited by mpcchuang on 2016-2-17 at 13:05. I’m different from that person in your factory; I have a highly intelligent mind. I’m a prophet, and I never do ** things. I can predict the future trends of stock markets and commodities, as well as the decline of companies. I kept copies of the documents I submitted to Sinopec ten years ago, detailing the process by which a company begins to decline. This process of decline can only be halted through reform. Changing the wording cannot alter the company’s declining situation; this is what it means to be in a state from which it is difficult to recover. Ten years ago, I volunteered myself, but no one took me seriously. I don’t really care, but the device behind me collapsed along with it, and it can no longer display the impressive performance it used to have in terms of operational efficiency. Who brought it down? Of course, it was those who had high salaries and power; greed and bribery are crimes. But isn’t disrupting production also a crime? Can this company survive by paying high salaries while evading consequences? Even if it can be operated, can it do so efficiently? I am a descendant of a revolutionary and also of an official; the foundation built by my parents has been ruined by certain people, which is why I write so diligently. Otherwise, why would I get involved in such trivial matters? Working isn’t my only way to make money. It’s just that I feel it’s a shame that my sharp mind isn’t being used in my main career, but at the same time I don’t want to expand the business so that incompetent people can benefit from it. After all, I’m old now, and everything is but fleeting.
OP, this is outright provocation: lol； It seems you should understand the reasons behind this; it’s simply dissatisfaction and anger toward the current situation, and the original poster surely has a story to tell