I’m asking everyone: what mesh size filter should be used to remove calcium ions?
Thread Content
The main material in the pipeline is brine, and to filter out the calcium ions contained in it, what mesh size of filter would be appropriate?
The original poster’s requirements are way too high – using so many stages of filters to remove calcium ions is not realistic
I was wrong in my wording; it’s about filtering out the gypsum particles, not the ions.
To filter calcium ions, ordinary filters certainly won’t be able to do it; membrane-based equipment is more suitable for this task. I’m not sure if the original poster meant something different.
This post was last edited by CoCo070563 on 2015-12-12 at 12:53. This can be achieved using our cyclone filter, which consists of a stainless steel screen plus a cyclone. 0.4-0.6 ten thousand units. Contact via in-site message.
The filters I manufacture for the brine industry are generally used in devices for purifying salt-making brine; they consist of multiple filter units with an internal framework made of 316L stainless steel (perforated plates)； It is covered with a polypropylene filament filter cloth, or a polypropylene skeleton section filter column is covered with a polypropylene filament filter cloth. Depending on the solid content, a hydrocyclone is used in the initial stage, with a precision of around 5 microns, to remove harmful impurities from the brine, thereby increasing production efficiency, extending production time, and enabling comprehensive utilization.
Can my filter have a minimum size of 0.5?
In fact, the filtration accuracy depends on the requirements of the specific application; by choosing filters with high precision, it is possible to achieve the desired level of accuracy. Practicality and cost-effectiveness also need to be taken into consideration