Code for Fire Protection Design of Petrochemical Enterprises
Thread Content
Are the parts that are not in bold in the petrochemical regulations considered recommended requirements?
Some specifications state that the bolded parts are mandatory. I understand that in the relevant specifications, those parts that are not highlighted in bold do not imply a mandatory requirement; they are merely used for emphasis. There are many such parts that are not highlighted in bold, and it is necessary to refer to the wording used in the specifications – such as \"must\" (strictly prohibited), \"should\" (not recommended), or \"is advisable\" (not suitable).
It is best to design in accordance with the standard requirements
There is an explanation in front of each specification indicating what are the mandatory requirements and what are the recommended ones, as well as whether they should be in bold or not; it’s not necessarily the case
There is an explanation in front of each specification indicating what are the mandatory requirements and what are the recommended ones, as well as whether they should be in bold or not; it’s not necessarily the case
What is in bold is definitely mandatory; it should indeed be so. The petrochemical regulations contain numerous explanatory clauses throughout, which need to be read several times