Thread Content
I am conducting market research in China and plan to introduce Fluor’s sulfur recovery technology to this market, with the goal of keeping SO2 emissions at levels below 100 mg/Nm3. This technology is already in use at the Yitai project in China as well as at many overseas refining projects. If any friends are interested, you can add me on QQ at 30233056 for a private chat. Thank you!
Please give some support. Could the original poster reveal what process is used to keep the exhaust emissions below 100?
Two-stage Claus hydrogenation and amine-based flue gas treatment, formula-based absorbent.
You can explain in detail – everyone is currently striving to reach 100. If the technology you promote has advantages, I believe there will be a market for it.
It would be convenient to leave a QQ number so we can chat privately.
Currently, **SRU emissions in areas with special emission requirements are required to be below 100 mg/Nm3, and actual owners also demand levels lower than this. Currently, in China, some methods involve adding an alkaline washing unit after the exhaust treatment system; others employ alternative processes, such as the LS-Degs technology recently developed by Qilu Institute, or Shell Consof’s process technology. I wonder how much Fluor can achieve, and what the operating costs will be. And Fluor has its own subsidiaries in China – will there be any conflicts?
Is it ion liquid desulfurization, or Shell’s Consof process?