HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

About Rosemount vortex flowmeters

2016-03-07View Original

Thread Content

One of the Rosemount integrated vortex flowmeters in this unit has a measurement range of 0–100 cubic meters per hour; the medium used is compressed air. When it is not in use, its reading occasionally fluctuates from zero to around forty or fifty. 1. On-site inspection revealed that the signal strength was very low, at just a little over 1 unit; occasionally it would rise above 4, indicating unstable signal quality ; 2. Using automatic optimization doesn’t help either; however, after optimization the small-signal cutoff value automatically jumps to around 63. Once the small-signal cutoff is adjusted to a reasonable level, the value shown is around 15, with fluctuations between 15 and 18. At this point the valve is in the closed position (the valve has some internal leakage; it was checked but the leakage seems not to be that severe). 3. After restoring the filter to its factory settings, I manually reduced the low-pass cutoff frequency (I decreased it by several levels until the signal returned to near zero; only then did it match the frequency roughly. Increasing the frequency didn’t produce any changes. I’m not sure if this approach is correct). After that, the signal value was around 4, and the flow rate indicated a value between 0 and 0.6. However, even after closing the valve once the flow rate exceeded this level, the value didn’t return to zero, remaining around 1–2. Could the experts familiar with Rosemont please advise on how to handle this? Was there something that wasn’t checked properly? I haven’t checked the probe yet as time was short; it’s only been a few months, so I think there shouldn’t be any problems. Thank you all first
Reply #22016-03-07
Please check first whether this flow meter is vibrating. If it is vibrating, that will have an impact
Reply #32016-03-07
There was slight seismic activity, but it seems the impact shouldn’t be that significant
Reply #42016-03-07
Then try increasing the trigger level value and see
Reply #52016-03-07
Please take the time to check whether there is any AC signal in the 24V circuit
Reply #62016-03-08
Is this watch installed properly? Are both the upstream and downstream straight sections meeting the requirements? Is the flow rate sufficient? Is the density ratio setting in line with the operating conditions? Should a gas be chosen as the measuring medium?
Reply #72016-03-08
If conditions permit, take the table offline and place it in a vibration-free location to check; it’s likely still due to vibration
Reply #82016-03-08
I didn’t dare adjust the trigger level – does that have a big impact? Is 4 the default for all?
Reply #92016-03-08
None of these are a problem; they’ve been working fine all along
Reply #102016-03-08
If it’s allowed, I’ll take it apart and take a look when the time comes.
Reply #112016-05-26
There’s no need to disassemble it; compressed air has a low density, and since its sensor’s sensitivity is set high, it becomes very sensitive to vibrations as well. It’s a typical zero-point instability issue; only low-flow cutoff can be applied – change it in his settings.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.