HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Problems with the airtightness test of towers

2016-03-30View Original

Thread Content

The hydrostatic test at 5.0 MPa for the towers in the chemical plant has been completed, and the equipment pipelines have been connected. The design institute requires a leak-tightness test at 4.0 MPa. Is it possible to use a test with the system pressure below 4.0 MPa instead?
Reply #22016-04-06
For the 80-meter-high tower, a hydrostatic test was carried out after it was welded in 4 sections on-site; as mentioned in the question, do some engineers not conduct a gas-tightness test on each individual tower section, instead using a system-level gas-tightness test?
Reply #32016-04-06
The requirements for gas tightness of the system are different from those for the gas tightness of the container itself, and they generally need to be addressed separately. It is also acceptable if the system’s airtightness test pressure is the same as that of the container body.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.